@SpaceBatAngelDragon
Surely a transman whose sexuality is gay should be his preferred choice? And the only choice for someone wishing to support trans rights, and the reproductive rights of trans men specifically. No need for a co-parenting situation, they could be an actual couple. Why is he excluding trans men?
This is exactly what I’m wondering. This has to be the logical solution for all those (biologically male) gay men who believe TMAM/TWAW and who want to be fathers.
Just find the kind of gay man who was born with a uterus and vagina and you don’t need a surrogate, you don’t need a “broody lesbian couple”, you don’t need any help from anyone else at all! Just some good old fashioned gay PIV sex, and job done. Barring actual fertility issues, of course.
Why are OJ and other high profile gay men not considering this route over and above any other, if they really believe TMAM?
Could it possibly be because their sexual orientation is exclusively towards other males, after all? Could it possibly be that despite what Stonewall says and despite what they themselves profess to believe, they’re not “homogenderal” after all, but homosexual?
Could there possibly be a gigantic whiff of the most monstrous hypocrisy going on here, especially from those who believe lesbians are “transphobic” if they refuse to countenance “girldick”?
Or are they really just that stupid?
As Gibbons said, you need to be pretty sharp to tell a fundamental lie consistently.