Which brands are too woke for my custom?

[TheBuffster]

Following the Innocent doubling down on we protect everyone from discrimination apart from women bs I was wondering who else I should be avoiding and why.

So far my list is
Innocent (woke Twitter pandering)
Coca cola (subsidiary of innocent)
Flora (withdrew advertising from Mumsnet)
Oatly (guardian as)

Any others I should know of?
Thanks 😊

www.transrightsarehumanrights.co.uk/

Knock yourself out.

I think a good sense brands list would be a good idea.
Is Morrisons supermarket ok?
FFS marmite. Lots of letters to write.

GWR (for that marvellous reply on their Twitter feed which effectively said "No, we are not kink-shaming you by having a porn filter on our in-train wifi which prevents you surfing the web for sex toys while on a long journey. We simply have customers with children under 18 who may be walking up the aisle of the train and do not wish to see that over your shoulder" - only he said it much more elegantly and succinctly.)

Wasn’t that in response to a complaint by someone who is in a position of public influence? Don’t they work for a political party or as an adviser or something?

@Whatwouldscullydo

Lush Body shop Asda Tesco Ocado M&s Star bucks

Hell! Where do I get my groceries from then?!

Yes its getting a bit like that now...

@Whatwouldscullydo

Yes

Tampax
Always
Natra care
Bloody good period

What’s Natra Care done?

The usual "people who menstruate" and "menstruator" stuff. And a petition to rename shopping aisles as something other than feminine hygiene due to the implications that periods are dirty and that only women have them.

T*s

Most ironic thing is many of these companies donate products to girls in third world countries to keep them.in school.

How do they know who to give them too

The bbc

Ooh, and the guardian

The Morning Star.

This is a list of Stonewall diversity champions. There are a lot.

www.stonewall.org.uk/diversity-champions-members
I think there is already a thread on the excellent blog from legal feminist
legalfeminist.org.uk/2021/02/01/submission-and-compliance/

@gardenbird48

GWR (for that marvellous reply on their Twitter feed which effectively said "No, we are not kink-shaming you by having a porn filter on our in-train wifi which prevents you surfing the web for sex toys while on a long journey. We simply have customers with children under 18 who may be walking up the aisle of the train and do not wish to see that over your shoulder" - only he said it much more elegantly and succinctly.)

Wasn’t that in response to a complaint by someone who is in a position of public influence? Don’t they work for a political party or as an adviser or something?

Its Diana James - gave evidence to the women and equalities select committee on women's refuges

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3593346-DV-Select-Committee-contributor-wants-to-browse-adult-sites-on-train-wifi

I recognise the others but what is wrong with M&S? I thought they’d be safe!!

Changing room-Gate.

@TashieWoo

I recognise the others but what is wrong with M&S? I thought they’d be safe!!

www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ms-apologises-trans-shopper-after-21541569

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8351127/Marks-Spencers-transgender-policy-puts-women-girls-risk-voyeurs-say-campaigners.html

Bodyshop - for attitude to JK Rowling

Superdrug - didn’t they have a ‘people who menustrate’ product as well?

@Sexnotgender

Cheeky wipes.

Oh no what have Cheeky Wipes done (or not done)?

I'd like to see the justification, as the Op has done, rather than simply naming firms.

Well, JK Rowling better start writing faster, because I'm running out of books!

Me too.

@Tanith

I'd like to see the justification, as the Op has done, rather than simply naming firms.

I agree with this. Links not necessary but summary would be useful.