This is excellent news. Is it in the public domain who nominated her? If it's the Tories I would say they're making a very clear mark in the sand doing this. She's only been a professor for two or three years, so it's not marking the end of a long career. It therefore looks to me that it's awarded because of the work she's been doing on academic freedoms and freedom of thought/speech. Am I being unduly optimistic?
I really hope not Gasp0de. I felt the same when I saw this.
Here’s an article about how the decisions are made.
www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/18976709.new-years-honours-work-decides/
”This vetting process, to avoid bringing the system into “disrepute”, can involve the input of government departments, regulatory bodies, professional organisations, HM Revenue and Customs and the ACRO Criminal Records Office.”
Sounds like it’s relatively rigorous and it seems unlikely this is accidental.