@SophocIestheFox "But passing is solely about what other people believe. So yes, it is contingent on other people believing it."
In my case, they believe it, which is a relief, cos when they didn't they were often extremely, and violently unpleasant to me.
"Riddle me this, posi, why is it that you think posters here have to respect your identity (your belief that you’re female),"
They don't. Disrespect it all you like - nothing happens.
"but you’ve littered this thread with fairly patronising insistence that most of us have a gender identiny that we simply haven’t been able to find. Is that respectful?"
That was a single comment made ironically to illustrate the the fact that telling me I don't have a gender identity when I do, is no more valid or useful than telling you that you do have a gender identity when you don't.
"And it’s also pretty clear that you don’t believe posters here have any expertise in law, biology, or any other specialism,"
What can I say, other than the fact that it doesn't matter what science I post - no progress will be made on your belief that trans women are simply men. Here look, this is an article in Scientific American - a well respected mainstream scientific journal. Now watch what happens:
www.scientificamerican.com/article/sex-redefined-the-idea-of-2-sexes-is-overly-simplistic1/