I think sex and gender have got confused here,
There is no doubt for the vast majority of people wear clothes designed for our sex. So they are cut to fit our bodies, male or female. Not all, but most of us do.
This doesn’t mean we wear clothes that are gendered as a majority though. Because for decades now women have worn things like jeans, jumpers, hoodies, trainers, jogging bottoms, trousers etc.
A plain white shirt ans a pair of indigo jeans is not gendered, however they are usually cut for our sex. Be you male or female.
This isn’t what the op was asking for though.she wasn’t asking about clothing cut. She was asking about clothing being gendered as she wears clothes like those she posted. The typically female gendered stuff like big pink skirts or Mary Janes.
The reality is these clothes are not what would be called popular. They are not common across any female demographic nor have they been for a long time. Clothes the op deems “non gendered” are more the societal norm It is what most women wear now. The jeans, trainers, jogging bottoms, trousers etc.
Walk down any high street and you see it. But this doesn’t mean we are wearing clothes that are not cut for our sex, it doesn’t mean we dress androgynously.
Dressing for your body shape, your sex is very different to dressing for your gender. The op dresses for her gender, and is in the minority based on the items she posted, the majority of women dress for their sex.
What I can’t understand is the op asks “has anyone tried it” like it’s something pioneering. When we’ve nearly all been doing it for decades. Instead of leading by example by shedding the “gendered “ clothing as she states, she is playing catch up with the majority of the rest of the western world.