https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/sep/08/caster-semenya-loses-appeal-against-world-athletics-testosterone-rules?CMP=ShareiOSAppp_Other
This is the lead paragraph in the article:
"The double Olympic 800m champion Caster Semenya appears to have lost her long-running legal battle against regulations requiring women with high testosterone to take medication to compete internationally between 400m and a mile."
Can anyone spot the problem?
This is why so many people are confused about the facts in this case.
Caster is not a woman with high testosterone levels.
Caster is a man who despite having an intersex condition has benefitted from the physical attributes (lung capacity, bone density, limb length, pelvic alignment, muscle mass etc) as a result of male puberty.
This type of reporting is imho incredibly irresponsible.
Also taken from the same article is a quote from Caster:
"“I am very disappointed by this ruling, but refuse to let World Athletics drug me or stop me from being who I am,” she said. “Excluding female athletes or endangering our health solely because of our natural abilities puts World Athletics on the wrong side of history. I will continue to fight for the human rights of female athletes, both on the track and off the track, until we can all run free the way we were born.”
Yet again let's look at the language here.
Caster has known since 2009 that they are biologically male and are thus (by definition) not trying to exclude them because they are female - quite the reverse.
To run free as Caster was born would be to compete as a male.
Rather what Caster wants to run as is how they identify (at least for the purposes of sport).
There is a deliberate attempt here to use intersex conditions to confer sporting advantage which also has the power to act as a way to breech sex based categories that enable trans competitors to claim similar rights.
If Caster as an XY can compete as a woman then why not a trans woman?
This is why the case is important and I'm increasingly irritated by the poor reporting on this issue.
The facts have been known for a very long time and Casters condition is not hard to explain in layman's terms.
Finally I wish sporting bodies (yes IOC I'm looking at you) would stop this obsession with testosterone levels in and of itself.
It's indisputable that the primary benefits males have physically over women are not the sole result of current testosterone levels but the physical development testosterone conferred on the male body during puberty - something a reduction of testosterone level would not reverse (also note the reduced levels are still vastly in excess of natural testosterone levels in women).