Ann Sinnott is asking for clarity on guidance for the Equality Act

[MilleniumHallsWalledGarden]

around the guidance for the Equality Act 2010, and is crowdfunding for a judicial review. Thought I ought to spread the word.

[title edited by MNHQ at OP's request]

£6k in six hours at an average of £30 each. Women's grassroots activism is fantastic

*five hours

😬

I've always liked gardening. Good for the soul.

I've dug and I shall dig again on 1 September when my new budget month begins

The be also dug (without the tip). I can't do as much as some of these wonderful women who are fighting on the front line but I can do my bit by donating where I can.

FFS!
I've also dug!

Digging away here too, planting in the hope of later

So glad to see this. Have also dug (minus CJ tip).

I can’t donate. Am skint

But if my heart and soul counts. Am donatin* that

I’m so glad to know about this. It looks like a really interesting case- particularly the issue of whether EHRC has breached its duty to foster good relationships between people with protected characteristics.

This looks brilliant, it's exactly what is needed.

[daffodil

Wow, it’s over £8k already.

She's raising £1000 an hour.

Have dug and very pleased to see the response. I also note that, just like so many other of the current projects, there are significant numbers of men contributing. This scandal is of epic proportions and the population are starting to recognise it and taking action to support all these legal challenges.

Important so bump!

It always amazes me how quickly these gardens grow. TRAs tell us that no-one cares about single sex spaces, but this garden has been open less than 24 hours and it's nearly half way.

Ha. Go Ann

@MilleniumHallsWalledGarden it’s great to see her almost half way already, thank you so much for highlighting. But do you think it might be good to repost about this using a subject thread that doesn’t rely on readers knowing who Ann is? Just thinking there are many others on here who would dig in but might have missed this thread

I've seen there a few TRA's encouraging this in the belief that the end result will be in their favour. Maybe they are right? Or is it their delusions are so deep set? It needs clarification either way.

The TRA's may be considering their friends in high places but that would mean our legal system is corrupt and I am sure that isn't the case (I can't be deleted for stating the obvious, can I .

So far as I can tell, this is pretty straight forward. There's masses of evidence

A change of thread title might be useful. I had no idea who Ann Sinnott was and only looked at thread because it was at the top of the page.

Thanks highame. That's what I'm hoping. It seemed clear cut to me but you never know. I'm not in the same league intelligence wise as some on here so wondered if I was missing something (apart from brain cells!)

Even if these cases don't go in our favour, at least we will have clarity and know how to best proceed. If it turns out that the law is on our side, then our next step is to enforce the law. If it turns out that the law is not on our side, then our next step is to change the law. Either way we start to get some parameters on this nonsense. The TRA goal is to make every sooo complicated that words can't possible be defined, ideas can't possibly be contained within catagories etc, so nothing can be meaningfully enforced by law. We need to get everything spelled out in black and white. Once we get some definitional boundaries around things, start fencing in who is and is not included by the terms "trans", "woman" etc, then we can start the work of closing those catagories in until they just include actual literal women.

@DialSquare

I've seen there a few TRA's encouraging this in the belief that the end result will be in their favour. Maybe they are right? Or is it their delusions are so deep set? It needs clarification either way.

Sounds like they've been reading the misinterpreted guidance for too long, which is why they think they're right.

Either way, the case will hopefully bring more widespread attention.