But you seem to want to make some women's things open to some male trans people, but only the right sort of male trans people.
Oh for goodness sake, I haven't said anything about what I want.
I think that many women feel differently about different groups of transwomen. I don't know how they would want to differentiate them, I suggested one way, but it is really pretty irrelevent to what I was saying.
I also said that I believe they would have a variety of views about what sorts of things might be open to whom, and again, without going out and doing some detailed polling, I can't tell you what each of them would think.
People here sometimes talk as if the most hard line GC position is the one that the vast majority of women would want to see instantiated, in terms of political solutions, and my point was I am not convinced that is true.
Asking me what that does for women or what it would look like - why even ask me that, the whole point is that it would have to be explored in some kind of public discourse.
But this sort of aggression when someone even mentions that maybe many women would have different views, and snide comments about them (or me, weirdly) not being woman centred? If a woman gives her considered view on an issue about women, and she's told sorry, you aren't a woman-centered woman - well, who is - the women that dismiss the views of other women when they don't like what they say?