While all of this is still 'women's issues' we won't get anywhere. Same as with other issues that are actually for society but get framed as 'women's issues' subtext it's up to women to sort them out. Men carry on as usual without a second thought.
I don't think that's true, lots of men think about the implicatons of capitalism. Or not lots, but as many as can be expected when most people doesn't even understand that it is something that could be questioned.
It gets brouht up in the context of women's issues because when you have a capitalist economy, it tends to most advantageous to those who hold the most power and to whom the benefits of the labour of those below accrue. So Bill Gates (for example) is so rich not only because of his own work but because capitalism delivers him a part of the value of what his many workers produce.He doesn't have to do anything to make that happen, it's a systemic feature - in fact avoiding it becoming too extreme requires interventions.
So one problem is that due to biology, women are disadvantaged in the world of paid work, so can often be at the bottom of the heap. (Though in most western countries now I believe unskilled men are worse off.)
But the other question is around work that is not part of the money economy. This kind of work is interesting because it doesn't get transferred anywhere, the benefit goes to the person who does it or to whomever they do the work for (a neighbour, a friend, their kids.) Since capitalism has existed, more and more areas of life have gone from being of this second type of work to the first, there is a real push for that. Many of the areas that have been work for self have until recently been the work of women, domestic work, childcare, other types of care. (Not all obviously, outdoor work as someone said is often more male dominated.) So as it becomes more common to outsource these, it represents a greater commercialisation of life.
Whether you see that as good or bad, it will tend to affect women a lot, so it becomes a women's issue.