I don't think the courts took reasonable account of the fact that Kate had blocked Hayden on twitter - so how was it harassment?
This is really important. I made this point upthread, but in the Harry Miller case, the judge ruled that Harry's tweets were directed at people who had chosen to follow him, not at the wider public. This is the exact opposite of the judge in Kate's case, who decided that all tweets could be read by everyone - even though, as we know, Kate had blocked Hayden to stop Hayden reading them.
Even allowing for the fact that Miller's case was a judicial review and Kate's was a criminal court, I don't see how it can make any legal sense to have two opposite rulings on the use of Twitter.
Am very glad new evidence has been found.