Why is breast cancer funded far more than prostate, despite prostate being more prevalent?
Do you know what, I'm going to bite on this one, because I think it's worth saying.
Firstly, I don't know tonnes about prostate cancer, but I'm pretty sure that breast cancer (particularly triple negative breast cancer) affects and kills more younger women. And of course, cancer research tends to be utilitarian in its approach, and there is lots of research going into triple negative at the moment as its the breast cancer that has yet to be 'unlocked'.
But, more than this, I can tell you that since the 1970s, women have worked their fucking arses off to raise awareness of breast cancer and also to raise funding for research, founding charities like Breast Cancer Care, Breast Cancer Now and Coppafeel, which was started by the incredible Kris Hallenga. Hence there is so much 'branding' around breast cancer, this didn't happen by magic, it is down to people (mainly women) working really hard to make it happen. Some people don't like the pink thing, they think it's sexist, call it 'pink washing' and believe it hides the reality of breast cancer. But the fact is, it has worked and awareness and funding for breast cancer has increased hugely in the last 40 or so years.
If men feel that they are losing out in terms of funding or awareness for prostate cancer, then they are of course welcome to put the work in to ensure that it gets the funding that it needs.
It's a bit like when women discuss DV and women's shelters, and men come out with 'well where is the help for male victims of DV?'
Men are perfectly able to campaign to help other men in whatever way they can. If they are not willing to do that... Well that's not on women to sort out.