Viewing women's survival strategies as "shitty behavior" helps me understand why you only see two choices there. Thanks.
Of course there aren't just two choices, but then I'm not the one who suggested that, am I.
Our position in social systems will shape our behaviour, as individuals and a group. That is true wherever we find ourselves in those systems. And none of us crate those systems, they are bigger than all of us, in many ways bigger than the classes or groups that exist within them. Even the political or ruling class is often only able to shift things slightly, if they really have a strong and unified desire to do so.
That's the case for women, which you seem to accept and think it explains behaviour that ends up costing others. But it's also the case for men. If you think it's ok for women to cost others because those are the behaviours that they are shaped to within the system they find themselves in, why would the same thing be a problem for men?
By the same token, there are plenty of people who use their place in the system in a way that costs others, and it's because they are selfish shits and don't care if they hurt someone else. It's not that they are being forced to do it, that no other option is possible. I decide to use sex to get a promotion, but it's ok because I am just fighting the system as best I can? I shouldn't worry that three other women, not to mention maybe others, are actually materally screwed over because of that? I can decide, as a publisher, to publish porn, because it makes me a lot more easy money than publishing something more worthwhile. But that's just using the system to get ahead, and I didn't create the system, so that's ok.
I call bullshit on that. Some people have no choices, but many many people do, and if their choices are driven by caring about their own well being and not that of others, it's exploitative, even if they are women.