See, that I don't get. If you're not repeatedly breaking talk guidelines or whatever, how can any so called "watcher" report anything "report worthy?"
There'd be nothing to report.
This is just such utter bollocks it’s hard to know if the intention is to be disingenuous, naive, or gaslighting.
I had a post removed, but I was able to reinstate it. This was the offending paragraph:
*Things that are factual. We should be able to state things that are factual. Such as:
• The types of surgeries undertaken under the terminology of “sex reassignment surgery”, “gender affirming surgery” or various other terms are major surgeries. They include double mastectomy, orchidectomy, penectomy and formation of a sinus (a blind ended pouch).*
I had to insert the word “terminology” in place of where I had written the word “guise”. The word guise, used by me as normal vernacular of English and in no way abusive, was deemed “inflammatory” after someone reported it. It was ridiculous that I had to change that word as it’s a perfectly normal sentence in the English language but I was grateful at least I got the chance to repost.
It is beyond the pale to suggest that posts are reported and removed for genuine reasons when everyone has seen or had personal experience of posts being removed for mind-boggling reasons.
And again, I am blaming the reporters, not the moderators.