Thanks SirVix, will have a look.
Here is my reply to Next:
Thank you for your reply. I find it strange that you claim to be being “accommodating to as many customers as possible” whilst putting 52% of the population at risk of sexual offences (voyeurism, upskirting, flashing and assault), in order to appease a small percentage of customers who wish to enter the changing rooms of the opposite biological sex.
Tell me, how do you know whether a biological male genuinely believes the falsehood that he is a woman, or whether he is a pervert or paedophile? You cannot possibly know. The Equality Act 2010 exists to preserve single sex spaces for the safety and privacy of biological women. You are putting biological females at risk with this policy.
Did you know that the vast majority of self-titled “transwomen” still have a fully functioning penis, and that as a statistical group, “transwomen” commit sexual offences at the same rate as men?
Have you seen the huge numbers of reviews of women’s underwear by men (yes, they list their gender as male) on the M&S website, which are clearly written in the context of a sexual fetish? Even reviews of teenage training bras?
Next is either being extremely naive to think that this policy will not be exploited by autogynephiles, or there are men high up in Next management who are actively encouraging this.
Thank you for clarifying your position. You have lost my custom.