Sacked by the NSPCC on 12th August,

[mimivanne]

I've not seen this reported anywhere till today but good news.
The rubber fetish wanker who filmed himself in the NSPCC loo at work was dismissed on 12th August ,I hope he isn't employed by another charity.

@WotgunShedding

Wasn't it Munroe bergdorf? Apologies if I've misremembered

Yes it was.

Didn’t the NSPCC call everyone hateful meanies and bullies for saying ‘errrr there’s a person online posting videos of themselves masturbating in what they are saying is your offices... not good!’ (also I knew you can have a cigarette/lunch/loo break but this is taking the Mickey)

Yes they did. A significant number of employees 'came out' in support of Makings, against the 'kink shamers'.

It would be interesting to know if the monthly direct debits dropped off around that time, if the kink shamers took their money elsewhere.

"98% of men, and 73% on woman watch porn regularly according topsychologytoday.com)"

Don't believe this for a second.

I couldn't get past the first paragraph. What boring drivel.

I remember a really disturbing discussion around this where some people were arguing that it was unfair, and that everyone wanks at work

Yes, I think LOJ was one of the prime proponents of this view. He was very indignant about it.

I remember when this was all happening and I saw the screenshots shared. He's being a bit creative with the truth there iirc.

I'm not saying this is whats happening and I'm not expert, but exhibitionism is a kink that demands attention.

I just scrolled back and read the whole thread to remind myself of the details. (Quite the emotional jolt to see LangCleg's post!) As always, MN is rigorous in its recording of events and the inclusion of links and photos . Such a useful resource.

as there was a link on his LinkedIn bio to his fetish stuff, I saw it

LinkedIn??? Umm, does nobody have any shame anymore? Why would you want to combine your sex life and your work, unless you're a sex worker as opposed to a children's charity worker?

I captioned one of my videos to say it was filmed ‘in the toilets at work’, and that another in a hotel was filmed on a work trip. For the record; they weren’t.

Hmm, someone's pants are on fire.

Even if they weren't, he's using his work, the NSPCC, to provide a sexual thrill for the people reading those captions.

He can't see it's wrong, either.

I saw that blog post ages ago - what a whiny whiner.

even if he did erroneously think that he was doing it anonymously (I don't believe that, however, as there was a link on his LinkedIn bio to his fetish stuff, I saw it. Not sure why he's denying it now).

He’s either a colossal dimwit or a fibber well, obviously both but whatever.

Iirc, the LinkedIn link led to a video where he was interviewed and the interviewer used his fetish name (Tubby Rubber Cub or something like that) and a little Googling led straight to the... brain bleach-necessitating material. Which was quite clearly him as he has a very, uh, distinctive physique.

I hope the intelligence services are looking for MNers to tap on the shoulder again, because I urgently need a new job and I’ve clearly got the skills

@RedDogsBeg

I captioned one of my videos to say it was filmed ‘in the toilets at work’, and that another in a hotel was filmed on a work trip. For the record; they weren’t.

Hmm, someone's pants are on fire.

I bloody hope his pants aren’t on fire, all that rubber? It could be an environmental disaster. He’s also not sorry one bit, it’s all the nasty terfs what have done it.

Oh God that blog is absolutely ridiculous!😂 Are we really supposed to read that and go 'Awww, poor bloke, you can't even film yourself wanking in the toilets at the NSPCC without people coming after you'?!

I didn't see anyone calling him and paedo. I saw lots of people suggesting that someone who invites minors to message them privately online (Bergdorf) and someone who publicly posts films of themselves wanking in a rubber suit 'in the toilets at work' do not have sufficient safeguarding knowledge to be associated with the UK's largest children's charity.

Stupid man. If I post a video of me masturbating in a toilet on social media and title it "me wanking at work" then I should not be surprised if it ends up in the local papers as a video of a GP masturbating for public titillation in the surgery toilets.
I'm not stupid though and few women end up in this sort of mess.

Rubber underwear gives skidmarks a whole new meaning.

Leaving aside the whole ick factor...
Who has time to get into a rubber suit and have a wank at work? Most people barely have time to eat lunch! I've tried to get on and out of a wetsuit a fair few times- it takes nearly as long as the dive.
Is this how they justify the pay gap? Are creeps like him providing something like this as a service?

Silky fibbing man. I distinctly remember that his LinkedIn profile had a link to his fetish page where he posted his dodgy photos.

I was (and still am) gobsmacked that anyone thinks that's appropriate unless they work exclusively in the fetish world. I can't believe the NSPCC even employed him in the first place.

And EsmaCannonball's post is bang on. Even if it does make me feel a bit nauseous.

@2Rebecca

Stupid man. If I post a video of me masturbating in a toilet on social media and title it "me wanking at work" then I should not be surprised if it ends up in the local papers as a video of a GP masturbating for public titillation in the surgery toilets. I'm not stupid though and few women end up in this sort of mess.

Yes, women never do this sort of thing.

Why do so, SO many men do all this absolutely bizarre shit? So many men. Men of all subgroups, education/wealth/power/sexualities/identities/whatever. What on earth is it about. I just don't get it.

He's like Jess Bradley - putting out the kink shaming "defence".

They both were/are so self absorbed and totally well xxxxxx xxxxx (words I can't say within guidelines).

Exhibition of this sort absolutely thrives on the thrill of being discovered.

That's why it's done at work/on the train etc. It needs a potential audience.

Do these people ever consider the harm of that potential audience if they were to be interrupted in their "hobby"?

No. All they care about is being "kink shamed".

They are no different to flashers in a park.

Any "kink" that depends on the risk that a non consenting child/adult might be privy sexual activity is a form of assault.

It's not kink shaming. I hate that term.

Do what you want with consenting adults in the privacy of your own home but as soon as you start to rely on potential non consenting bystanders being a crutch to getting a hard on - it's a hard pass.

It's about utterly inappropriate behaviour that in most cases is illegal.

Also if it was all so awful why is he dredging it up again? Some of these men (it's usually men) seem to live in a parallel universe where "kink shaming" is a thing and sexual exhibitionism whilst working for a children's charity isn't a concern. They need to get out of their echo chambers and only share adult material with trusted consenting adult friends not the internet

To be fair, the article referred to was (apparently) published in June 2020.

On the other hand, putting that on the Internet is not going to be a guaranteed win with future employers.

@MouseyTheVampireSlayer

Leaving aside the whole ick factor... Who has time to get into a rubber suit and have a wank at work? Most people barely have time to eat lunch! I've tried to get on and out of a wetsuit a fair few times- it takes nearly as long as the dive. Is this how they justify the pay gap? Are creeps like him providing something like this as a service?

One of my dad's favourite jokes:

A man approaches workers at a building-site, and asks "Do you have a Shagbreak here?".
"No mate, we barely get tea-breaks!".

Why do so, SO many men do all this absolutely bizarre shit? So many men. Men of all subgroups, education/wealth/power/sexualities/identities/whatever. What on earth is it about. I just don't get it

It all ties in neatly with the twitter thread that was linked on another thread showing TW doing exactly the same in female toilets and changing rooms, including in close proximity to children, filming it and uploading to SM. No doubt Makings would justify that in the same way he justifies his own behaviour in his poor me blog.

Safeguarding, safety, respect, dignity, privacy and comfort for women and girls seem to be alien concepts to a certain cohort.

I admit I fast-forwarded through the first hundred thousand words, but was amused to see, after all the verbiage about being sexually aroused by wet-suits, a hearty recommendation for Mermaids!
With friends like these...

a hearty recommendation for Mermaids!

Yes, why not a hearty recommendation from the charity he let down so badly, the one who supposedly stood by him and only had to let him go because of those nasty Terfs?