It’s also totally hypocritical, since none of these TERFs have an issue with the charity working with various cis-gender celebrities that have engaged in public sex, have had sex scandals, or have fully frontal nude imagery freely available, but when its a trans woman who is not ashamed of her sexuality, its suddenly an issue.
WTF?
What bullshit. If the NSPCC was EVER using celebs from the porn industry or celebs who have public sex then I most certainly would have a problem with it. Male or female. In fact, probably more so if female, because of the message that would send to young children who are already at very high risk of sexual exploitation and grooming.
And as for all the rest of that piece. It seems what happened has had a huge effect on him. That's a shame for him. But quite frankly, this is a Children's Protection Charity, and anyone who thought that it was alright to post the sort of things online that he did should not be working in one, even if he did erroneously think that he was doing it anonymously (I don't believe that, however, as there was a link on his LinkedIn bio to his fetish stuff, I saw it. Not sure why he's denying it now).
The only people who should be working with vulnerable children are those who understand the enormous burden of safeguarding, and would therefore never make that mistake. We, as a society, and the NSPCC as a charity, have dropped the ball on safeguarding massively in the last 10-15 years. It needs to be its first and foremost principle. The protection of children is more important than the feelings of their staff and volunteers.