Active discussions

Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Sacked by the NSPCC on 12th August,

157 replies

mimivanne · 11/10/2019 13:01

I've not seen this reported anywhere till today but good news.
The rubber fetish wanker who filmed himself in the NSPCC loo at work was dismissed on 12th August ,I hope he isn't employed by another charity.

OP posts:
HandsOffMyRights · 11/10/2019 15:21

And, regarding the lack of media coverage, the charity has friends in low and high places:

Sacked by the NSPCC on 12th August,
LordProfFekkoThePenguinPhD · 11/10/2019 15:42

I remember the old days when folx just worked in charities for their OBEs...

MouthyHarpy · 11/10/2019 16:48

OP Good.

testing987654321 · 11/10/2019 16:57

held at the V&A Museum of Childhood

Just why? Could they not find a suitably adult venue?

GlitterToast · 11/10/2019 17:52

Didn’t someone post at the time that one of the papers had written a report on this but then decided at the last minute not to publish it? I wonder why...

terfsandwich · 11/10/2019 18:01

That would have been before the sacking I think.

This is great news!

Fraggling · 11/10/2019 20:11

The thing with this

Is it was the nspcc etc

But in general

How are people esp women to feel when they have meetings with a man with these predictions? If I recall, he was wearing rubber underclothes, and wanked and pissed in them, and was excited about wearing them for the rest of the working day. And had posted this online.

I don't know about you but I'd feel really uncomfortable having a work meeting with a man who I knew was wearing rubber pants full of come and piss due to a fetish.

How is this even a thing to be open about?
Why did his employer back him?
Why is there no consideration whatsoever of the impact on other people working there?

That's even before you get to it being nspcc.

This is not ok in any industry.

Yet the employer, Owen Jones, pink news, others? All backed him. Backed the fact that this man would be going around at work having meetings interacting with colleagues like this, and that they would know.

What is going on exactly.

MockersthefeMANist · 11/10/2019 21:06

this man would be going around at work having meetings interacting with colleagues like this, and that they would know.

Or maybe they wouldn't. And the thought of them not knowing while the pee sloshes his bits must fair make him hard.

Is there a work context anywhere this would be acceptable?

(Apart from the obvious.)

terfsandwich · 11/10/2019 21:55

Did he actually wee into the suit? I thought he just went to the toilet while wearing it.

Surely that would have smelt.

Dangerfloof · 11/10/2019 22:02

Or maybe they wouldn't. And the thought of them not knowing while the pee sloshes his bits must fair make him hard
Eeeeewwwwww

ahagwearsapointybonnet · 11/10/2019 22:05

DuMonde well you could say, at least he practises what he preaches Hmm

VictoriaSpongeAndTea · 11/10/2019 22:23

The V&A museum of Childhood a bare arse with self luv on it Envy not envy obvs They planning a show of Rolf Harris paintings next? And maybe a retrospective of Top of the pops?

OrchidInTheSun · 11/10/2019 22:30

@terfsandwich from what I've seen 🤢 his rubber suit has a cunning space so that fluids can escape. He just filmed himself performing the actions. And then pulled up his clothes over his rubber suit having posted himself wanking and pissing online, and then attended a nspcc meeting about child protection.

Fraggling · 11/10/2019 22:34

Mockers he posted it on the net
Attached to his linked in profile or something iirc
That was how randoms found out in first place
And talked about it
So yes his colleagues would have known sooner or later
And iirc again, he was planning on wearing the fluids, as it were
Maybe sometime has the original tweets

His employer backed him.

Wtf.

Fraggling · 11/10/2019 22:36

Xposts

It is not ok to expect people esp women to conduct meetings etc with a man who they know has his pissy comey fetish pants on.

Yet nspcc, Owen Jones, penis news etc said women who were wtf were homiphobic bigots.

It's a sexual rights movement for men no more no less.

Lordamighty · 11/10/2019 22:39

I’m looking forward to the NSPCC explaining their original support of this individual to the Charity Commission.

Fraggling · 11/10/2019 22:54

Have they been reported?
I mean they sacked him quietly, how long after the event?

What is becoming clear is that all the protocols, laws, procedures we had around, stuff. Aren't really worth the paper they're written on. And worked mainly because people just abided by them. There is no automatic thing to shut down people who breach. There has to be complaints, court cases etc which takes time and money etc. It shows how weak it all is tbh.

TheProdigalKittensReturn · 11/10/2019 23:30

Wait, didn't the NSPCC initially insist that the only possible reason anyone could think the person in question's behavior was inappropriate was homophobia? Is that still their view as an organization, and if so why has the man in question been sacked? If they changed their minds after actually listening to the public's concerns, then where is the apology for their initial, dismissive and downright condescending response? If that's not and never was their view as an organization then what are their plans going forward to ensure that their social media team behave in a way that's in keeping with the values of the organization?

TheProdigalKittensReturn · 11/10/2019 23:35

Has anyone asked them the questions above on Twitter? I don't do Twitter but the NSPCC is an organization that's important enough and focused enough on a vulnerable group that they really ought to be accountable to the public, and for that reason I feel like this is a case where the public pushback should be hard and shouldn't stop until they publicly acknowledge that they messed up and commit to not doing so in the future.

People trust the NSPCC to keep their children safe, and in return the NSPCC has a responsibility to take public concerns seriously and not just brush them off on the assumption that the public are idiots.

OccasionalKite · 11/10/2019 23:51

So: NSPCC tweets supported wanky rubber pup man wanking at work and putting the footage online. Railed against "bullies", when people objected to an employee of a children's welfare and wellbeing charity, filming himself pissing and wanking, and putting the footage online, himself.

They have sacked him so quietly, this wanky rubber pup man wanking at work and putting the footage online, whom they supported at the time.
Talk about a fucked-up organisation.

youllhavehadyourtea · 12/10/2019 00:01

Remember this?

Sacked by the NSPCC on 12th August,
Fraggling · 12/10/2019 00:38

What happened with jess Bradley in the end?and the online pics with wanking at work and talking about wanking at bus stops etc?

TheProdigalKittensReturn · 12/10/2019 00:51

Not that I care about the happiness of the man who was sacked, because he should have been imo, but if I did care about him, as presumably the people who were all over the media defending his actions at the time do, then I don't think I'd be too happy to hear that he'd quietly been sacked the moment no one was paying attention after a big public display of support. So really the NSPCC have pleased nobody here, they've just made themselves look like untrustworthy hypocrites.

TimeLady · 12/10/2019 08:22

To be clear, we're not tarnishing all NSPCC employees with the description of "wanky pup rubber man". It was very specifically James Makings.

uncommongroundmedia.com/nspcc-employee-films-himself-masturbating-at-work/