Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Toilets - what do we want?

324 replies

Mxyzptlk · 01/09/2019 18:52

We don't want men in women's toilets, okay.
Do we want single sex toilets as they've been until now? Can those be maintained against the trans onslaught?
What about the trans rights we say we care about? How can they be upheld without affecting women's right to safe toilets?

What do you think would be the ideal situation, fair to everyone?

OP posts:
tellmewhenthespaceshiplandscoz · 02/09/2019 11:18

Rufus Grin

SirVixofVixHall · 02/09/2019 11:19

Rufus Grin

Datun · 02/09/2019 11:21

This whole debate always reminds me of the way the debate about homosexuality went when section 28 was repealed.

Anyway unless you are checking what people have in their pants you will probably not know what gender they are.

There you go, bandying about words like homosexuality and gender, when you don't stand a cat's chance in hell of actually defining what they mean.

But feel perfectly entitled to call people ugly and intolerant, on the same basis.

Remarkable.

AlisonGrant · 02/09/2019 11:30

it doesn't really affect me because I am disabled and barely use toilets out because they are disgusting and filthy in my area where people pee on the seats but that's the problem with disabled toilets they are for men and woman there is no woman only disabled bathrooms so men can pee all over them because they wont lift the seat

DickKerrLadies · 02/09/2019 12:00

The debate reminds me more of when women were fighting to get the right to vote due to not being allowed such an opinion because men thought they knew best.

DickKerrLadies · 02/09/2019 12:00

I'm sure those men thought that women voting was low priority though and that no-one really cared.

EmpressLesbianInChair · 02/09/2019 12:03

Anyway unless you are checking what people have in their pants you will probably not know what gender they are.

I've just realised that that's a REALLY TRANSPHOBIC COMMENT.

Juells · 02/09/2019 12:05

I've just realised that that's a REALLY TRANSPHOBIC COMMENT.

Explain? I thought it was just a bit dim Grin Along the lines of all those people who claim that 'trans have been using women's loos for years and you never noticed hahaha'.

EmpressLesbianInChair · 02/09/2019 12:09

Explain? I thought it was just a bit dim grin Along the lines of all those people who claim that 'trans have been using women's loos for years and you never noticed hahaha'.

Oh yes, it's dim. But it's also implying that genitals are linked to gender, which goes right against the whole idea of women having penises.

jossprior · 02/09/2019 12:09

In the National Survey of British Attitudes 34, I think.
86% of women, are comfortable sharing with trans women.

Datun · 02/09/2019 12:16

Oh yes, it's dim. But it's also implying that genitals are linked to gender, which goes right against the whole idea of women having penises.

Quite.

Juells · 02/09/2019 12:17

Yeah, sure they are Grin

LangCleg · 02/09/2019 12:37

God loves a trier, so they say. Goddess, not so much.

tellmewhenthespaceshiplandscoz · 02/09/2019 12:47

joss I've googled that survey and can only see that 3000 people were surveyed and no indication of the breakdown of respondents by sex.

I'm reserving judgement on that conclusion as even best case scenario all respondents were women 3000 is hardly representative of all women.

tellmewhenthespaceshiplandscoz · 02/09/2019 12:53

And I may have read wrong but I think it said data was from 2016?

Tyrotoxicity · 02/09/2019 12:59

86% of women, are comfortable sharing with trans women.

And not a single one of them has the right to give away my human rights.

The 14% have power of veto on this one.

Tyrotoxicity · 02/09/2019 13:05

Joss is advocating for the principle that human rights may be removed from an oppressed class by popular consensus.

I say no.

Wurzelsnewhead · 02/09/2019 13:13

Is it this one? Can’t see the figure quoted , correct me if I’ve missed it.
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/775589/Attitudes-equality-social-attitudes-survey-2017a.pdf
If however its make up data time, I’d like to have a go too; 135% of men are comfortable sharing with transwomen (yes 135 out of 100 can’t beat that!).

LangCleg · 02/09/2019 13:30

What do we think the results would be if the question were reworded: "Are you happy sharing toilets with male crossdressers?"

Doyoumind · 02/09/2019 13:37

That data has been questioned before because it doesn't define for people what a trans person is and it can mean many things to many people.

Tyrotoxicity · 02/09/2019 13:47

Whether the data is valid or pulled out of someone's arse is a diversion.

No percentage of women will ever have the right to consent to the removal of my right to single-sex spaces.

Because no one has the right to give consent on my behalf.

OnlyTheTitOfTheIceberg · 02/09/2019 13:54

And not a single one of them has the right to give away my human rights.

The 14% have power of veto on this one.

Absolutely this.

Not that I believe 86% of women actually are happy to share (what definition of 'trans' are we using this week? Gender dysphoric? AGP? Drag queen?) but even if it were 99%, we listen to the 1% who aren't happy. When there are so many other options than women giving up their space, the space that society has agreed for decades is a fair and proportionate response to the risk that males as a class pose to women as a class, there is no reason whatsoever to trample over the rights of those who want a space where they can be vulnerably female in safety, privacy and with dignity.

Doyoumind · 02/09/2019 13:58

I certainly agree but it would be interesting to here the response from women if the survey were accompanied by pictures of Alex Drummond and Daniel Muscato, for instance.

Doyoumind · 02/09/2019 13:59

*hear the response 🙄

Tyrotoxicity · 02/09/2019 14:10

Not sure that would be allowed, Doyou.

We're not allowed to use secondary sex characteristics to assess the likelihood that an individual is a member of a statistically high-risk class any more.

It's either transphobic to link these characteristics to one sex class or the other; or it's... discriminating against women whose natural bodies fall outside a narrowly-defined male-gaze-centred range in one particular regard?

I'm a bit unsure on this latter because no one's ever managed to explain it in a way that makes sense and correlates with reality, but it's definitely 100% transphobic.

Basically, it's mean to observe people's sex. Because reasons.