Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Boohoo the poor menz: a BBC report on why men's feelings should be equal to women's in the abortion debate

275 replies

ByGrabtharsHammarWhatASaving · 29/08/2019 12:38

www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-49240582

"Men are usually involved in an abortion in one of four ways, all of which can leave men traumatised when they come to reflect afterwards on their roles, say those running counselling groups for post-abortive men. Sometimes men coerce a woman into having an abortion against her will; others say they will support the woman's decision either way, while steering that decision toward abortion. Some men find out about the abortion for the first time after the fact, or the abortion goes ahead against their wishes."

Speaking as someone who was coerced into an abortion I didn't want, I couldn't give a fuck how traumatic it might be for him to later "reflect" on his actions. One day he'd be saying it was all my choice and he'd support me no matter what, the next day he'd be making plans to move country if I had the baby, the next he'd be threatening to use his contacts at social services to have the baby removed from me and saying he'd take full custody if I went ahead, then the next day he'd be bringing me gifts and begging me not to terminate. Shockingly that was quite a lot to cope with whilst also studying full time and experiencing such extreme morning sickness I could hardly think. Shockingly I decided that wasn't an environment I could justify bringing a child into. When I went for the surgery, because I was 11 weeks by the time I decided, he begged to be allowed to come with me, then never showed up because he decided to go shopping for a new BMW instead. I never heard from him again, but I lost the next 3 years of my life to severe depression over the guilt and regret I felt. I seriously and frequently considered suicide. I engaged in very high risk sexual behaviour in the hope of contracting some terrible STD which I felt was what I deserved. I went to the doctor several times but was rejected for help each time and told to basically get over it as it was "my choice". I was offered a single counselling session by the NHS with a woman who told me she "only really knew about miscarriages" and suggested I just make a list of pros and cons to look at when I felt sad. Ultimately I dropped out of university because the course material focused often on pregnancy which I found too upsetting. Many years later I now have 2 children but I still cry to think of the one who isn't here. So I don't give a shiny fuck how the man who got me pregnant feels now.

At the same time another friend I knew became pregnant by a man who was abusive to her but for religious reasons didn't want her to terminate. He would turn up to her house in the middle of the night screaming at her that she was a murderer. He made her life a living hell, but because of her termination she was able to finish her degree, leave that relationship, and is now happily married and professionally successful. So I don't give a flying fuck how the guy that got her pregnant feels now either.

""Men are meant to be protectors, so there is a sense of failure - failing to protect the mother and the unborn child, failing to be responsible," says 61-year-old Chuck Raymond, whose 18-year-old girlfriend had an abortion in the late 70s when he was a teenager."

I don't give a fuck, Chuck.

"He likens the mental and emotional anguish that can follow an abortion to battlefield post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)."

Post abortion stress syndrome isn't even a recognised condition for women yet, you know, the people actually trying to make the life changing decision in the midst of morning sickness, social pressure, and often male coercive control. The ones who actually have to choose between giving birth and raising a child, or going through an often traumatic medical procedure. And I don't believe for a second that these poor "traumatised" men actually wanted to raise the baby themselves, it's all about not being able to control the woman.

"It's changing now, men are fed up," Ms Bonopartis says. "Men had bought into how they have no say in this and that if they speak out, they are against women, but now the impact is being felt by more and more of them as the repercussions of 45 years of abortion are being seen."

FUCK. OFF.

FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF

I don't care if men are fed up. I don't care how sad they are, or if they feel emasculated by not being able to control women, or if they feel like being made to pay child support somehow gives them part shares in women's bodies, or if they think that they are the natural protectors of children and women (despite being their number one killers) and should therefore be allowed to "protect" a fetus by forcing it to be born to an unwilling mother when 9/10 times they have no intention of caring for it themselves. I don't give a single fuck and I am so angry that the BBC has run this "sympathetic" article which basically says men should be allowed to have a say in women's medical care. Men can state their preference for an outcome, fine, and they're allowed to be upset if that preference isn't followed, but they have no right, not now and not ever, to expect their preference to be given equal weight to a woman's.

So, fuck off BBC. Fuck off Alabama. Fuck off all pro forced birth people but especially pro forced birth men. Fuck off to my ex and to my friends ex, and to the exes of all the equally traumatised women I met in the one solitary non religious (i.e you need forgiveness) post abortion support group I was able to eventually find online because no one gives enough of a shit to form one in real life on behalf of women. Fuck off to anyone who thinks the decision over what happens to a woman's body should be in the hands of anyone but the woman herself. Fuckity fucking fuck off.

OP posts:
Fraggling · 31/08/2019 11:45

'Sorry, I mixed up real life rate of condoms which is 85% with the unrealistic perfect use which is 98%.
But since no one can possibly use condoms perfect, my mis-remembered of 20 in 100 is not far off the actual 15 in 100.'

Link.

It is really really really out of line to spread misinformation about condoms.

They also protect against stds which in het sex are more readily passed from man to woman than vice versa but that doesn't seem to be something you'd be interested in.

I get the feeling you have the same attitude as couple of men I've met.

I don't like condoms don't want to use them
Piv or nothing
Waahh you're pregnant nothing to do with me why should I have to do anything not fair

Plenty of men about like this. These are the men this argument is trying to help.

Fraggling · 31/08/2019 11:45

Right to sex is a topic?

Interesting.

bd67th · 31/08/2019 11:47

should not legally be required to pay child maintenance

That's not going to fly. The second the child is born, its rights come into being, including the right to paternal support. The mother does not have the moral nor legal right to agree to defund the child.

Again, there's a huge level of entitlement and ignorance when comparing pregnancy, abortion, and birth to having to pay over money.

A: "Quick, call the midwife!"
B: "OMG I didn't know you were pregnant."
A: "I'm not, I've just had my council tax bill."

I strongly recommend that you join me in funding Vasalgel research. Men absolutely need to have the maximum options available to them to use their bodies to prevent fatherhood.

DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 11:48

“This is such a grotesque comment. Really it is.
So if women won’t abort at the man’s say-so, then he has no financial responsibility? Despite being there at conception. So it is ABSOLUTELY coercive control, punishment if you don’t abort. Just gross. ”

No it is not, what IS grotesque is that women can get pregnant and choose to keep the baby, but force that father to financially support that child despite having no say in whether that child should even be born.

That is coercive control. It is no coercive control to have the same right as a woman which is to choose to be a parent or not.

Fraggling · 31/08/2019 11:48

Omfg

The answer to piv isn't the be all and end all of sex, is anal,,?

Fucking hell!!!

I'm happy to misgender you, you're a bloke. The idea of sex that doesn't involvr getting a dick in an orifice doesn't compute! Ha.

(and what happened to oral? Men used to like blow jobs. Now it's cunt, arse hole or nothing no that's not sex... How we progress...)

Fraggling · 31/08/2019 11:49

Women don't force the man to give financial support, the state does.

Because they don't want children going hungry and recognise it takes 2 to tango.

Are you new to this game? You need to go back to reddit and get some better arguments Grin

DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 11:49

“Again, there's a huge level of entitlement and ignorance when comparing pregnancy, abortion, and birth to having to pay over money.“

Agreed because you guys seem to think that 9mos and childbirth is so much more than 18yrs of indentured servitude.

kalinkafoxtrot45 · 31/08/2019 11:49

Men’s feelings really are at the very bottom of my priority list when it comes to this issue. And there are plenty of ways they can get their jollies without putting their sperm inside a woman.

Guys, contraception protects you, as well as your partner, from unwanted pregnancy.

Additionally, if you are against abortion then perhaps it is worth finding out whether your partner agrees. That will have the added benefit of ensuring you are never confronted with the unfortunate situation, as that revelation will send most women running in the other direction immediately.

DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 11:51

@Fraggling
Yes, I know the state and laws require child maintenance, but that is one item that I think needs to change. I was quite clear by using “should” and “legal”
Thanks for the noncomment.

Fraggling · 31/08/2019 11:54

Indentured servitude Grin

Fraggling · 31/08/2019 11:56

'No it is not, what IS grotesque is that women can get pregnant and choose to keep the baby, but force that father to financially support that child despite having no say in whether that child should even be born'

This is what you said. No should or legal in there.

You really dont like women. Do yourself and us a favour and simply stay away.

DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 11:56

@Fraggling
What happened to oral?
Do I need to list every possible sex act in a response to you? I chose to focus on anal because it is most similar to Piv sex not because there are no other kinds.

I’m not a bloke. I am a woman. XX born and bred, baby.

Fraggling · 31/08/2019 11:57

Most men in uk who are separated don't pay any support, and many more pay a pittance. Is the real situation.

Many children in the uk living in poverty, is the real situation.

Women are blamed for this, is the real situation.

JessicaWakefieldSV · 31/08/2019 11:58

No it is not, what IS grotesque is that women can get pregnant and choose to keep the baby, but force that father to financially support that child despite having no say in whether that child should even be born.

They have a say when they have PIV sex. After that, it’s the women’s body so no man can have a choice in that, you don’t understand coercive control at all and have absolutely no concern for the rights of the living child to parental support. I haven’t encountered this level of MR activism on these boards for some time. Utterly gross.

bd67th · 31/08/2019 11:58

Male Privilege Activists come in both sexes, although most are men. The "financial abortion" argument is almost always stated by men.

Right to sex is a completely different topic from right to choose motherhood or fatherhood.

Actually, the topics are inseparably linked in het relationships, what with PIV sex leading to parenthood. If you've chosen to have sex, you've chosen to accept that pregnancy may result. That's beyond notions of "rights", it's biological reality. The rights of the woman take precedence during the pregnancy and the rights of the child take precedence from birth onwards. That's how the rights pan out in any society that bans enforced servitude (a.k.a. being life support against your will) and safeguards children. I recognise that this doesn't seem great for men, but they don't provide life support with their bodies and they are not children.

As I have said many times in this thread: support Vasalgel to give men more choices pre-conception.

JessicaWakefieldSV · 31/08/2019 11:59

Imagine a young poor women being told she had to have an abortion by the father or she’d be stuck with the entire financial responsibility. People who support this are vile & have no concern for impoverished women. How horrible.

Fraggling · 31/08/2019 12:00

Baby?

You need to work on your approach you're being way too obvious.

You can say whatever you want. But automatically thinking anal, if piv is off the table, our of all the things that can be done, points in one direction. Also those poor lesbians still unable to have sex :( so many sads for the lesbians, how can they do anything at all when neither has a cock? It's literally impossible. (these days one of course might but that's another thread)

DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 12:00

@Fraggling
“Because they don't want children going hungry and recognise it takes 2 to tango.”

The laws are old fashioned. Now women can go get inseminated and have a baby all on their own with no need for financial support from the sperm donor. Women are financially self-sufficient. So, if a pregnant woman wishes to keep a baby against the fathers wishes, he should be relegated to the status of a sperm donor.

DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 12:04

“They have a say when they have PIV sex”
Again, this is a non-argument. It is the same as telling women that they do not need legal abortions because their say in whether to be a mother or not is when they have PIV sex.

No, my opinion is not MR activism. I did not start this thread. I am not being an activist. I am simply expressing a different opinion on a thread started by someone if the majority opinion amongst mumsnetters.

Fraggling · 31/08/2019 12:04

The dislike just oozes out.

Some women are financially independent and have children via insemination no need for a man

=

The worst possible thing for an insecure, unattractive man to hear. How will men like him get women if women are allowed to be financially independent and also to have children without men? Its not fair.

Pota2 · 31/08/2019 12:05

Condoms are much more effective than 80% if used properly.

Men already get away with not paying child support. The only people suffering from your plan is the children. It’s only money. Think about the millions of women who are left raising kids when the man fucks off to lead the single life, even though he was initially keen to be a dad.

Men already do give their opinions on abortion. Lots of women are pressured into abortion or guilt tripped into keeping a baby. There have been various court cases where men have tried to force women to remain pregnant and give birth. The opinion of men only becomes an issue where he wants something different to the woman. It seems that you do accept that women must have the final say over what happens to their bodies so why is the man’s contrary view relevant?

It’s the gestation that gives you a say over what happens in respect of the pregnancy. Men don’t have property rights to their sperm. The fact that their sperm has been used to create a fetus doesn’t mean that they can now have any say over the woman’s body. It just doesn’t work like that.

DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 12:06

@JessicaWakefieldSV
“Imagine a young poor women being told she had to have an abortion by the father or she’d be stuck with the entire financial responsibility. People who support this are vile & have no concern for impoverished women. How horrible.”

Yes, imagine only having a child if you can afford said child. Nothing wrong with that.

Pota2 · 31/08/2019 12:08

Women are not all financially independent. There remains a large gender pay gap. Women with children lose out hugely on earnings over a lifetime. Forgive me if I am not that sympathetic if a man loses 15% of his income for 18 years. Chances are he’s probably earning more than women doing the same job anyway. And of course a large percentage of men pay absolutely zip in child support, despite being legally obliged to do so.

DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 12:10

@Fraggling
“The dislike just oozes out.

Some women are financially independent and have children via insemination no need for a man

=

The worst possible thing for an insecure, unattractive man to hear. How will men like him get women if women are allowed to be financially independent and also to have children without men? Its not fair.”

You have the wrong end of the stick dear Fraggling. The fact is women ARE financially independent and self-sufficient. We don’t need the parternalistic protection of a patriarchal society to chase down money from a sperm donor. Every child I had, I chose to have that child. The difference between me and you is that why I think my choice = responsibility to raise that child myself, you are still stuck in the patriarchal mindset of poor little ol’ me, I’m just a girl, I can’t raise a child without money from a man.

bd67th · 31/08/2019 12:11

A: "Quick, call the midwife!"
B: "OMG I didn't know you were pregnant."
A: "I'm not, I've just had my council tax bill."

As the token child-free member of this board, I'd like to remind everyone that we all pay taxes that support children, unrelated children at that. We pay for schools, NHS services used by children, etc. Most of us do not complain. I do not complain and I will never have kids to benefit from this. Not sure how being charged child support for the upkeep of your own kids is much of a step over being charged taxes for the education of other people's.

Agreed because you guys seem to think that 9mos and childbirth is so much more than 18yrs of indentured servitude.

Paying money from your earnings doing your choice of job is exactly the same as "indentured servitude". Now you're taking the piss. I'll tell that to HMRC as an excuse to stop paying taxes and see how far that gets me.

Nine months pregnancy and birth causes permanent changes to a woman's body. This is not even remotely comparable to having a lighter wallet for eighteen years.

Swipe left for the next trending thread