Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Boohoo the poor menz: a BBC report on why men's feelings should be equal to women's in the abortion debate

275 replies

ByGrabtharsHammarWhatASaving · 29/08/2019 12:38

www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-49240582

"Men are usually involved in an abortion in one of four ways, all of which can leave men traumatised when they come to reflect afterwards on their roles, say those running counselling groups for post-abortive men. Sometimes men coerce a woman into having an abortion against her will; others say they will support the woman's decision either way, while steering that decision toward abortion. Some men find out about the abortion for the first time after the fact, or the abortion goes ahead against their wishes."

Speaking as someone who was coerced into an abortion I didn't want, I couldn't give a fuck how traumatic it might be for him to later "reflect" on his actions. One day he'd be saying it was all my choice and he'd support me no matter what, the next day he'd be making plans to move country if I had the baby, the next he'd be threatening to use his contacts at social services to have the baby removed from me and saying he'd take full custody if I went ahead, then the next day he'd be bringing me gifts and begging me not to terminate. Shockingly that was quite a lot to cope with whilst also studying full time and experiencing such extreme morning sickness I could hardly think. Shockingly I decided that wasn't an environment I could justify bringing a child into. When I went for the surgery, because I was 11 weeks by the time I decided, he begged to be allowed to come with me, then never showed up because he decided to go shopping for a new BMW instead. I never heard from him again, but I lost the next 3 years of my life to severe depression over the guilt and regret I felt. I seriously and frequently considered suicide. I engaged in very high risk sexual behaviour in the hope of contracting some terrible STD which I felt was what I deserved. I went to the doctor several times but was rejected for help each time and told to basically get over it as it was "my choice". I was offered a single counselling session by the NHS with a woman who told me she "only really knew about miscarriages" and suggested I just make a list of pros and cons to look at when I felt sad. Ultimately I dropped out of university because the course material focused often on pregnancy which I found too upsetting. Many years later I now have 2 children but I still cry to think of the one who isn't here. So I don't give a shiny fuck how the man who got me pregnant feels now.

At the same time another friend I knew became pregnant by a man who was abusive to her but for religious reasons didn't want her to terminate. He would turn up to her house in the middle of the night screaming at her that she was a murderer. He made her life a living hell, but because of her termination she was able to finish her degree, leave that relationship, and is now happily married and professionally successful. So I don't give a flying fuck how the guy that got her pregnant feels now either.

""Men are meant to be protectors, so there is a sense of failure - failing to protect the mother and the unborn child, failing to be responsible," says 61-year-old Chuck Raymond, whose 18-year-old girlfriend had an abortion in the late 70s when he was a teenager."

I don't give a fuck, Chuck.

"He likens the mental and emotional anguish that can follow an abortion to battlefield post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)."

Post abortion stress syndrome isn't even a recognised condition for women yet, you know, the people actually trying to make the life changing decision in the midst of morning sickness, social pressure, and often male coercive control. The ones who actually have to choose between giving birth and raising a child, or going through an often traumatic medical procedure. And I don't believe for a second that these poor "traumatised" men actually wanted to raise the baby themselves, it's all about not being able to control the woman.

"It's changing now, men are fed up," Ms Bonopartis says. "Men had bought into how they have no say in this and that if they speak out, they are against women, but now the impact is being felt by more and more of them as the repercussions of 45 years of abortion are being seen."

FUCK. OFF.

FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF

I don't care if men are fed up. I don't care how sad they are, or if they feel emasculated by not being able to control women, or if they feel like being made to pay child support somehow gives them part shares in women's bodies, or if they think that they are the natural protectors of children and women (despite being their number one killers) and should therefore be allowed to "protect" a fetus by forcing it to be born to an unwilling mother when 9/10 times they have no intention of caring for it themselves. I don't give a single fuck and I am so angry that the BBC has run this "sympathetic" article which basically says men should be allowed to have a say in women's medical care. Men can state their preference for an outcome, fine, and they're allowed to be upset if that preference isn't followed, but they have no right, not now and not ever, to expect their preference to be given equal weight to a woman's.

So, fuck off BBC. Fuck off Alabama. Fuck off all pro forced birth people but especially pro forced birth men. Fuck off to my ex and to my friends ex, and to the exes of all the equally traumatised women I met in the one solitary non religious (i.e you need forgiveness) post abortion support group I was able to eventually find online because no one gives enough of a shit to form one in real life on behalf of women. Fuck off to anyone who thinks the decision over what happens to a woman's body should be in the hands of anyone but the woman herself. Fuckity fucking fuck off.

OP posts:
Rufusthebewilderedreindeer · 31/08/2019 18:29

That’s just it though. I only view kids as “their kids

Unfortunately for some people (and i dont mean that snarky at all...in some cases of parenting i think its a shame) thats not how it works

They are their children...even if they are not the childrens parent

DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 18:31

Oops is that the time? Dinner is served.
Cheers xx

bd67th · 31/08/2019 18:42

What can women not get jobs and earn money? Can a single mother not raise a child by herself? Women do it every day. So don’t tell me that we need a man or his money or our child will be deprived and abused.

Children are expensive. I know couples where the mother has been forced to stop work because child care to cover her hours cost more than her wages. A woman can have enough money to raise a child alone when she gives birth, but then be made redundant three years later or have her hours cut and suddenly not have enough money, at which point, the State will tell her to file a child support claim and rightly because the child's father should support the child. Parents cannot know what the future will hold, which is one of the reasons why fathers should not be allowed to disown their children. Mothers cannot state that they will be able to support a child alone for 18 years because they cannot know what the next 18 years will hold, and they do not have the legal nor moral right to agree to waive the child's right to support from the father because no one can sign a child's rights away.

You are not seeing the children's rights aspect of this. Which is why your comments are so badly received on this parenting forum.

woman19 · 31/08/2019 18:49

Mothers cannot state that they will be able to support a child alone for 18 years because they cannot know what the next 18 years will hold

We can and many or most of us do.

That we choose to reproduce is in our gift.

Our fertility rates are still pretty good, while western men's had dropped by half over the last 40 years.

They better play nice.

bd67th · 31/08/2019 18:53

Nothing wrong with being a bastard. Attaching importance to legitimacy and recognition of fatherhood is patriarchy.

You miss my point. Creating two legal classes of children: a class with paternal support and a class without, and letting the fathers decide which class a child is in, is patriarchy v1.0 (biblical release). We're talking King David and his harem, we're talking about how powerful men would have a wife and mistresses and only the wife's children were "lawfully-begat" and could inherit titles and property. And you're talking about extending that power to every man, to decide whether he acknowledges and supports his kids.

What you advocate is purest patriarchy. You dress it up in libfem talk of girl power and women not needing men, forgetting that we are talking about what the children need, not what women need.

woman19 · 31/08/2019 18:56

forgetting that we are talking about what the children need, not what women need

Grin We see you.Wink

BarbaraStrozzi · 31/08/2019 19:36

Well said bd.

bd67th · 31/08/2019 19:40

Mothers cannot state that they will be able to support a child alone for 18 years because they cannot know what the next 18 years will hold

We can and many or most of us do.

  1. Most children have the support of both parents, either both present or one absent and paying child support.
  2. If you can see the future, please PM me with [checks watch] next week's lottery numbers. I'll go halfsies with you. Joking aside, a mother could be made redundant, have an accident that leaves her disabled, etc etc at any time whilst raising her kids. Her child could become disabled. You can't rule those things out. Those of you who have raised kids to adulthood without anything dire happening that having the father around would have mitigated, that's at least as much down to luck as to anything else.

Hell, 18 years ago I didn't think I'd go to uni as a mature student and end up owning my own home. And I don't have kids to add even more unpredictability to my life.

OrchidInTheSun · 31/08/2019 19:48

bd thank you for articulating that so clearly. Also if doomsday is female, I'll eat my mooncup

woman19 · 31/08/2019 20:00

Is this another Mike Pence thread?

Rufusthebewilderedreindeer · 31/08/2019 20:30

So doom is mike pence 😱

Hello mr pence....I thought you’d be taller!

StockTakeFucks · 31/08/2019 20:50

Jesus fucking Christ, all that blabbing and mental gymnastics and in the end it all comes down to "women do what men want because if you don't they'll either be sad or withdraw all financial support".

@DoomsdayCult while the woman is pregnant just her wants ,rights and wishes matter. When a baby is born,that baby has rights. The state acknowledges the baby as a person and their rights. One of those rights is to be supported by both parents. It's not about women , it's about children.
It's not a pair of shoes that she decided to get on a CC and he has to pay the monthly payments ffs!

It's not that bloody hard.

bd67th · 31/08/2019 21:15

One of those rights is to be supported by both parents.

And neither parent has the legal nor moral authority to waive that right on the child's behalf. Transferring the responsibility for delivering that right to adoptive parents is not the same as waiving the right.

Caucho · 31/08/2019 21:32

I don’t know how to reply sorry but my male pill comment was less women tricking men becoming pregnant (let’s not deny it ever happens though) but more men tricking women into believing they’re trying for a baby whilst secretly sabotaging it

placemats · 31/08/2019 23:44

Oh feck off with the women tricking men into having a baby shite.

Get a life.

HouseMouseQueen1969 · 01/09/2019 04:47

Men don't have any scintilla of input as to what I do with my reproductive function and capacity.

Fraggling · 01/09/2019 14:38

I wonder what the numbers are of

Women 'tricking' men by getting pregnant

Vs

Men using pregnancy, children, money as a means to control women, to bind them to them

Just a thought

1Micem0use · 01/09/2019 17:55

She wasnt spreading misinformation about condoms. They arent 100% effective, and as someone who is pregnant as the result of using condoms it's very refreshing to see that some people are aware that contraception doesnt always work.

Fraggling · 01/09/2019 18:47

The bald statement 'If used perfectly, 20 in 100 women will still get pregnant.' is misinformation aka bollicks aka a lie.

If used correctly they are 97% reliable.

Making up stats about contraception and then posting them on forums read by lots of people, is out of order.

Inteteresting as well that it's women who are being told condoms are unreliable, as who often doesn't like condoms and benefits from women deciding they are not reliable enough.

Also note that poster was not interested in the other benefits eg protection from std, or the under rated one of no mess.

Pota2 · 01/09/2019 18:56

Yeah the condom stat is bollocks. They are as reliable as many other forms of contraception. Men don’t want to wear them though because they reduce sensation a tiny bit. They would much rather that women suffer the side effect of hormonal contraceptives or just take the risk, knowing they can just blame the woman if she gets pregnant anyway and they don’t have to deal with it.

OrchidInTheSun · 01/09/2019 19:03

1Mice - didn't you realise the condom had broken?

Rufusthebewilderedreindeer · 01/09/2019 19:24

My SIL got pregnant through a broken condom

Ive had two break

But ive had a lot of sex...I don’t care what dh says

Fraggling · 01/09/2019 19:26

Well yes they aren't 100% reliable even if used properly.

That doesn't negate the fact that that poster was taking shit.

Rufusthebewilderedreindeer · 01/09/2019 19:27

That doesn't negate the fact that that poster was taking shit

Abso-fucking-lutley

97% effective at birth control and obviously stds etc

1Micem0use · 10/09/2019 07:25

No didnt feel a thing

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread