Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Boohoo the poor menz: a BBC report on why men's feelings should be equal to women's in the abortion debate

275 replies

ByGrabtharsHammarWhatASaving · 29/08/2019 12:38

www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-49240582

"Men are usually involved in an abortion in one of four ways, all of which can leave men traumatised when they come to reflect afterwards on their roles, say those running counselling groups for post-abortive men. Sometimes men coerce a woman into having an abortion against her will; others say they will support the woman's decision either way, while steering that decision toward abortion. Some men find out about the abortion for the first time after the fact, or the abortion goes ahead against their wishes."

Speaking as someone who was coerced into an abortion I didn't want, I couldn't give a fuck how traumatic it might be for him to later "reflect" on his actions. One day he'd be saying it was all my choice and he'd support me no matter what, the next day he'd be making plans to move country if I had the baby, the next he'd be threatening to use his contacts at social services to have the baby removed from me and saying he'd take full custody if I went ahead, then the next day he'd be bringing me gifts and begging me not to terminate. Shockingly that was quite a lot to cope with whilst also studying full time and experiencing such extreme morning sickness I could hardly think. Shockingly I decided that wasn't an environment I could justify bringing a child into. When I went for the surgery, because I was 11 weeks by the time I decided, he begged to be allowed to come with me, then never showed up because he decided to go shopping for a new BMW instead. I never heard from him again, but I lost the next 3 years of my life to severe depression over the guilt and regret I felt. I seriously and frequently considered suicide. I engaged in very high risk sexual behaviour in the hope of contracting some terrible STD which I felt was what I deserved. I went to the doctor several times but was rejected for help each time and told to basically get over it as it was "my choice". I was offered a single counselling session by the NHS with a woman who told me she "only really knew about miscarriages" and suggested I just make a list of pros and cons to look at when I felt sad. Ultimately I dropped out of university because the course material focused often on pregnancy which I found too upsetting. Many years later I now have 2 children but I still cry to think of the one who isn't here. So I don't give a shiny fuck how the man who got me pregnant feels now.

At the same time another friend I knew became pregnant by a man who was abusive to her but for religious reasons didn't want her to terminate. He would turn up to her house in the middle of the night screaming at her that she was a murderer. He made her life a living hell, but because of her termination she was able to finish her degree, leave that relationship, and is now happily married and professionally successful. So I don't give a flying fuck how the guy that got her pregnant feels now either.

""Men are meant to be protectors, so there is a sense of failure - failing to protect the mother and the unborn child, failing to be responsible," says 61-year-old Chuck Raymond, whose 18-year-old girlfriend had an abortion in the late 70s when he was a teenager."

I don't give a fuck, Chuck.

"He likens the mental and emotional anguish that can follow an abortion to battlefield post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)."

Post abortion stress syndrome isn't even a recognised condition for women yet, you know, the people actually trying to make the life changing decision in the midst of morning sickness, social pressure, and often male coercive control. The ones who actually have to choose between giving birth and raising a child, or going through an often traumatic medical procedure. And I don't believe for a second that these poor "traumatised" men actually wanted to raise the baby themselves, it's all about not being able to control the woman.

"It's changing now, men are fed up," Ms Bonopartis says. "Men had bought into how they have no say in this and that if they speak out, they are against women, but now the impact is being felt by more and more of them as the repercussions of 45 years of abortion are being seen."

FUCK. OFF.

FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF

I don't care if men are fed up. I don't care how sad they are, or if they feel emasculated by not being able to control women, or if they feel like being made to pay child support somehow gives them part shares in women's bodies, or if they think that they are the natural protectors of children and women (despite being their number one killers) and should therefore be allowed to "protect" a fetus by forcing it to be born to an unwilling mother when 9/10 times they have no intention of caring for it themselves. I don't give a single fuck and I am so angry that the BBC has run this "sympathetic" article which basically says men should be allowed to have a say in women's medical care. Men can state their preference for an outcome, fine, and they're allowed to be upset if that preference isn't followed, but they have no right, not now and not ever, to expect their preference to be given equal weight to a woman's.

So, fuck off BBC. Fuck off Alabama. Fuck off all pro forced birth people but especially pro forced birth men. Fuck off to my ex and to my friends ex, and to the exes of all the equally traumatised women I met in the one solitary non religious (i.e you need forgiveness) post abortion support group I was able to eventually find online because no one gives enough of a shit to form one in real life on behalf of women. Fuck off to anyone who thinks the decision over what happens to a woman's body should be in the hands of anyone but the woman herself. Fuckity fucking fuck off.

OP posts:
DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 17:50

@bd67th
“What you are repeatedly advocating is consequence-free PIV for men only. Women who become pregnant always face a consequence. Abortion is a consequence. Why should men who have PIV face fewer consequences than women?”

Because Mother Nature is a bitch. Lol. We are the ones who get pregnant. Lucky for us the NHS gives us free abortions. Can’t help consequences caused by biology. That is why women have greater rights in abortion as she is the sole decision maker. That is our compensation.

But these consequences you think should be invoked on men are not due to Mother Nature or biology, they are chosen to be implemented by the woman without his consent.

thatwouldbeanecumenicalmatter · 31/08/2019 17:51

WootenDennis MRA website is that way >>>>

bd67th · 31/08/2019 17:53

Barbara Or do you mean they're allowed a veto over the woman's decision-making process? Because if you mean that, then your protestation that you're pro choice is just bullshit.

Exactly this. If you think men should be allowed to defund their own children via "financial abortion", you are advocating that men be given a tool of coercive control over women's abortion decisions and you CANNOT call yourself "pro-choice".

DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 17:53

@BarbaraStrozzi
What do I mean by men should have a say about whether to be a father or not?
Good question. Already answered upthread. Suggest you read it.

SophoclesTheFox · 31/08/2019 17:56

Oh, wooten, pet, are you a bit confused?

This is a feminist board, so that whiff you’re catching of feminism is to be expected.

Lord alone knows what you were googling to stumble in here Confused

DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 17:56

@bd67th
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
“financial abortion”
That’s a new one! So the mother putting her child up for adoption, is she having a “financial abortion” then?

bd67th · 31/08/2019 17:56

no freedom of speech allowed here.

I think you've confused "freedom of speech" with "other people are obliged to provide you with a platform". They're not the same thing.

Why did I need to give information about how many kids I have or if we're expecting during sign up?

Because it's a parenting website.

Rufusthebewilderedreindeer · 31/08/2019 18:03

Why did I need to give information about how many kids I have or if we're expecting during sign up?

Is that what they said Grin

DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 18:04

@bd67th
“If you think men should be allowed to defund their own children via "financial abortion", you are advocating that men be given a tool of coercive control over women's abortion decisions and you CANNOT call yourself "pro-choice".”

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 hard to stop laughing at this.
But, here goes. Refusing to subsidise a woman’s sole choice to have a baby is not “coercive control.” In fact, the coercive control goes the other way. It’s coercion to force someone to be a parent against their wishes AND force them to pay you money to raise a child that only you want.

bd67th · 31/08/2019 18:04

But these consequences you think should be invoked on men are not due to Mother Nature or biology, they are chosen to be implemented by the woman without his consent.

They aren't though. They are invoked on the man by the State. It's the State that mandates that fathers contribute to the raising of their children. Not women. The reason why the State does this is because our MPs have passed laws to make it so, because believe it or not the majority of voters believe that fathers must support their children. So you are trying to blame women for something that is in fact the will of most people.

Men know what the consequences of sex are when they bed a woman. They know that absentee fathers are expected to pay child support. They choose to do it anyway. I don't have any sympathy for them. I gave three current highly-reliable alternatives up-thread: outercourse, wanking, and vasectomy after banking sperm. Just wearing a condom reduces his risk massively. It's not women's fault if men don't take those options. It's not the resulting child's fault either.

bd67th · 31/08/2019 18:09

So the mother putting her child up for adoption, is she having a “financial abortion” then?

Most adoptions are not for financial reasons.

Refusing to subsidise a woman’s sole choice to have a baby is not “coercive control.”

You are not subsidising her choice. You are supporting your child.

In fact, the coercive control goes the other way. It’s coercion to force someone to be a parent against their wishes

Which she hasn't done. He has three current options to reliably avoid that outcome, before his semen enters her body.

AND force them to pay you money to raise a child that only you want.

That's the State's doing, by majority consent of the electorate, not the woman's.

DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 18:09

So, if the absentee father doesn’t provide birthday presents, is that a “birthday present abortion” then? Oh, I know, if the father doesn’t want to talk to his kid, that’s a “communication abortion” isn’t it?

🤣🤣😏🤣🤣😀

SophoclesTheFox · 31/08/2019 18:11

that’s really unpleasant, doomsday.

bd67th · 31/08/2019 18:11

Refusing to subsidise a woman’s sole choice to have a baby is not “coercive control.”

You are not subsidising her choice. You are supporting your child.

And not supporting your child is child deprivation, a form of child abuse. You've come onto a parenting forum to advocate a form of child abuse and you wonder why people keep telling you that you are wrong.

DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 18:12

@bd67th
AND force them to pay you money to raise a child that only you want.

That's the State's doing, by majority consent of the electorate, not the woman's.

Yes and no. The woman can choose not to file for child maintenance.
I think the law on that should change. It’s old fashioned patriarchal crap to assume a woman needs a man’s moneybags to raise her kids. We don’t.

Rufusthebewilderedreindeer · 31/08/2019 18:14

It’s old fashioned patriarchal crap to assume a woman needs a man’s moneybags to raise her kids

Their kids

Rufusthebewilderedreindeer · 31/08/2019 18:15

Fucking brevity again!!!!

bd67th · 31/08/2019 18:15

doomsday, you know as well as I do that male privilege activists use "financial abortion" to refer to State-sanctioned child abandonment and child deprivation by the father. Search engines are your friend if you don't believe me.

bd67th · 31/08/2019 18:16

raise her kids

raise their kids. Ftfy

DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 18:17

@bd67th
“And not supporting your child is child deprivation, a form of child abuse. You've come onto a parenting forum to advocate a form of child abuse and you wonder why people keep telling you that you are wrong.”

Please! Its child abuse to give men the same right that women have. The right to choose to be a parent or not.
No it’s not. And why are you assuming that without a man’s money, the child will be deprived? What can women not get jobs and earn money? Can a single mother not raise a child by herself? Women do it every day. So don’t tell me that we need a man or his money or our child will be deprived and abused.

DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 18:19

@bd67th
I’d actually never heard the term “financial abortion” until you said it here.
The fact other people use it doesn’t make it any less ridiculous.

bd67th · 31/08/2019 18:21

Goddamit Rufus crossposted!

The woman can choose not to file for child maintenance.

The mother should, for the children's sake.

What you advocate is the creation of a legal class of bastards, children whose fathers don't recognise nor support them. I reject that. Every child deserves support from both parents.

DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 18:23

@Rufusthebewilderedreindeer
That’s just it though. I only view kids as “their kids” if both parents have chosen to be parents (or if the parent is trans and uses that pronoun obvs). One parent should not have the power to choose for the other (force them to be a parent).

AnneElliott · 31/08/2019 18:25

I agree with you op - and very sorry about what you went through.

I also think that men shouldn't have a say in determining abortion laws - it should be women who decide as we're the sex that deal with the consequences.

DoomsdayCult · 31/08/2019 18:27

@bd67th

Nothing wrong with being a bastard. Attaching importance to legitimacy and recognition of fatherhood is patriarchy.

Funny that is what bothers you...on a feminist forum.
Aren’t we supposed to be about girl power? Stand on our own two feet carrying our babies on our backs?

I don’t give a shit whether a kid is a “bastard” that’s some patriarchal BS right there.

Swipe left for the next trending thread