"In June, the Guardian published another editorial about “identities in conflict”, characterising trans people and feminists as distinct oppositional groups — ignoring pro-trans feminists. It was later amended following internal opposition. "
Compare this, from the "begging bowl" notice soliciting donations to The Guardian (which I have contributed to from time to time) - my bolding:
"The Guardian is editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism is free from commercial bias and not influenced by billionaire owners, politicians or shareholders. No one edits our editor. No one steers our opinion. This is important as it enables us to give a voice to those less heard, challenge the powerful and hold them to account. It’s what makes us different to so many others in the media, at a time when factual, honest reporting is critical."
Comprehensively Busted!
Whose "voices are less heard"? - Women's (you know who I mean) or trans advocates'?
Who is "powerful"? - They have just told us in the Buzzfeed article - the internal trans lobby group who "edited the editor" and "steered opinion"!
Who is "held to account"? - not the NSPCC over the Leather-Dog Wank-Meister scandal, not the Girl Guides taking safeguarding advice from a pornographer, not Stonewall lying about the Equalities Act, not the MOJ introducing "self-ID" throughout the Criminal Justice System, and on and on and on . . .
What is the latest scandal? The YHA - I wonder if they will be covering that one?