Telegraph column - not even attempting to hide AGP

[BretonDinosaur]

It’s behind a paywall, will post screenshots in next post

David Thomas is a 60 year old man, who according to his Telegraph column is still living as a man whatever that means. He is transitioning and he is writing about it in his weekly column. In the past he gave us Not Guilty: The Case in Defence of Men which is described as a rebuttal of feminist charges against men. So I think he’s established his misogyny credentials, which raises the question of why he wants to transition to emulate womanhood?

It’s so clear from the above article that it’s sexual arousal. He talks about his growing breasts in a clearly lascivious way. It’s not even gently disguised or denied. The AGP is front and centre in the article.

Yet we’re still not allowed to discuss it. We’re not allowed to point out that many men get off on the idea of being seen as a woman. They talk about it openly but the activists who seek to remove women’s rights shout us down as bigots for daring to raise it.

Those who are still championing the be nice/what harm can it do still seem to deny that it’s a driver. How? When it is this blatant how can it not be openly discussed and the risks/behaviours openly managed or challenged.

I'm trying to imagine the T enabling a woman undergoing transition to a man to refer to her new penis in such terms. I doubt very much they would print it.

He said in his column that he’ll have lots of suitors because he knows both the offside and lbw rules

I don't really get the TW dating scene. I know there are men who they call 'tr**ny' chasers (not being uncivil HQ, it's a direct quote).

Who are presumably bisexual, but possibly in denial.

But an actual heterosexual, your tall, dark, handsome stranger who seems to be a bit of a fantasy, won't be happening.

I'm reminded of that article when the transwoman was really disgruntled because no matter what they did, they couldn't get a heterosexual interested. Despite the pigeon-toed, gawky schoolgirl look so beloved of people like Shon fay.

And I'm not being funny, I genuinely don't get it.

Why would a heterosexual man date someone who is born male, when they're only interested in people born female? Who outnumber transwomen millions to one.

Why would a heterosexual man date someone who is born male, when they're only interested in people born female?

Google gynandromorphophilia and have a look at the Rod Fleming website.

I keep thinking of Dustin Hoffman's "epiphany" when he watched the footage after making Tootsie. He was "shocked" that his character wasn't more attractive and demanded that the stylists should make him "beautiful". Much shuffling of feet before they admitted "This is as good as it gets". He burst into tears as the realisation dawned.

Pesky reality intruding again.

Boobs are very much part of the obsession for some. This is a group of TRAs chatting about it.

Aww and nasty t*rfs make them feel bad for wanting hot tits. Absolutely not a fetish. Nope.

Ugh.

It makes complete sense to me. The man is there to make the transwoman feel a certain way.

Some will be genuinely bisexual though. Because some people are.

I've been meaning to post about DT on here for a while, ever since he wrote a column about women's toilets in which he stated:

"You know how parents tell children who are scared by spiders, ‘It’s much more frightened of you than you are of it’? Well, the same thing applies to transwomen in female-only toilets. However frightened women may be by our presence, we are way, way more petrified by having to be there.

[...]

For now, still presenting male, I can use men’s facilities. But every time I get off the train at London Victoria and take my late-middle-aged bladder off to the gents’, I think about the day, not too far off now, when I will have to go into the ladies’ instead."

Who the fuck thinks that much about using any train station toilet regardless of your sex? You can practically feel the excitement pulsing off the page.

He can fuck off to the other sid eof fuck and then fuck off even further, I'm beginning to hate this people.

Some will be genuinely bisexual though. Because some people are.

Of course. What they won't be is heterosexual.

Just tittering here.

Look, he could develop an equal amount of gynaecomastia by drinking too much alcohol for a period. Many 60 year old men do. And still none of them are women.

You only have to look on porn sites to see how popular this is sexually. Men do buy video clips where they are feminised by a woman. Men do have camshows with women while dressed as a woman.

For now, still presenting male, I can use men’s facilities. But every time I get off the train at London Victoria and take my late-middle-aged bladder off to the gents’, I think about the day, not too far off now, when I will have to go into the ladies’ instead."

For the love of God. Is he so blind to his fetish, that he doesn't understand people can see the saliva positively dripping off his chin?

I'm quite sure he isn't blind to it, Datun. Isn't audience-participation-without-consent part of the thrill?

Yes, I believe it is.

Which ever way you cut it up, whether people are a little suspicious, or downright nauseated, presumably that's the goal. You're right. I can't see any other way now.

Of course, not understanding that this will affect your livelihood, is quite another matter.

Nothing's stopping him using the unisex provision on the train now or in the future.

"You know how parents tell children who are scared by spiders, ‘It’s much more frightened of you than you are of it’? Well, the same thing applies to transwomen in female-only toilets. However frightened women may be by our presence, we are way, way more petrified by having to be there”

The only thing he’s frightened of encountering in the ladies lav is INVALIDATION.

Fascinating about the repeated use of 'having to' use the ladies, 'having to' be there.

This sounds like some kind of submissive fantasy to me; in my short career as a domme this sort of usage came up. So terrified but being forced to do it... Yuk. Hoping the telegraph editor is aware what they're printing.