Woman with a penis hopes to find lesbian woman with a womb (WWW) 'willing to escape the patriarchy and oppression and open her heart to a person and not just appendages'

[frazzled1]

medium.com/@samrangoon9/i-am-a-trans-woman-and-i-am-not-i-am-transphobic-and-i-am-not-am-i-too-queer-65baba6189bf

Yet same woman with a penis (WWP)....

I know I only want to have sexual relationships with women based upon the truth that I am a woman. I am a lesbian. But, shame, I do not know if I want to have a relationship with a WWP. I feel uncomfortable about this. I want to have a relationship with a WWW.

This person is clearly conflicted but boy do I feel for my lesbian same sex attracted sisters.

Haha now we're WWWs. New descriptions every day. Amazing how for millions of years 'woman' was easy to define, but now it needs all these qualifiers.

They say that they are simply women and I agree — as long as they agree with me that I also do not have to qualify my being a woman with the word trans. I am simply a woman. Once that is clear I think we can have progress.

In my second year, my best friend asked me if I was gay. I think that was because I was non threatening and spent my time with women, and shared a flat with them. I said that I would never have sex with a man because I could never “fancy one”.

The self-serving claptrap writes itself.

Some women are 6’ tall, bald with a beard

I’ve got a new acronym that I’ll probably pick up a deletion for. MAAFT.

My tolerance for this self-indulgent bullshit can’t get any lower. As soon as I read the words “deny us the right to exist” my brain switches off and suddenly the ironing becomes very appealing.

Of course WWW (women with wombs) have suffered from different types of oppression and deserve the support of other women . But they are a sub class of the large class of women.

I got to women being a sub class of women and am so livid i have no wish to read another word. Maybe ill force myself to read more later when i calm down.

That has got to be satire, surely?

I know a couple like this.

They are very happy, they are both lovely people, they have a child who is very happy.

I am GC, I have serious objections to the behaviour and demands of TRAs and what is happening to sex-based rights.

But in terms of individual relationships and families, people should be able to live how they like without prejudice and discrimination.

I do not agree with much of what is written in that article, and it seriously underestimates the impact of the difference between people defining themselves via gender and those who maintain the right to define by sex. It isn't 'just language'.

But if a person with a penis chooses to identify gender-wise as feminine (I have heard a trans person that I respect greatly define themselves as feminine identified trans) , and have a relationship with a woman (of any sexuality - it is up to her, her relationships are a personal choice) then they should not be subject to derision.

It's a fine line here.

That is surely a clever satire? No?

It's not about deriding a man who is feminine.

It's about a heterosexual, male born individual saying they don't fancy men, because penis, but gay women who feel like that are bigots.

It's ludicrously transparent. Men have been calling themselves lesbians to get in women's underwear since forever. Now they not only insist you agree, they insist you agree order to validate their autogynephilia.

Where are all the women insisting that gay men sleep with them, despite their vagina, and gay men are a subset of women who are men?

And I pass as a woman. Well, I do. I am a woman and this is what a woman looks like. However, no –one but me seems to realise this! So, I am called “sir” and “mr”.

No-one but me realises that I pass as a woman, so they address me as sir and mr

Surely this is a parody piece, it's too funny.

I am a live and let live person but that article hurt my head.

Surely this is a parody piece, it's too funny.

That was my first thought. I fucking hope so!

Oh, I missed that spam.

I think you might be right. I didn't get beyond...

So, let me start at the beginning. I was born...

Yes, I think it is satire now.

It's very difficult to tell these days!

There is already a word used universally for "a person with a penis" who wishes to have a sexual relationship with a woman. They are a heterosexual. No, it isn't a fine line.

I also think it’s satire, and as satire, it’s gold!

Haha now we're WWWs

What about those AFABs who've had hysterectomies? How exclusionary!

Surely this is satire. I hope so.

Ok i read the rest. I hope it is satire but who knows nowadays.

"I explained that I am a lesbian" made me laugh out loud.

• I am just a little too queer even for them

Nowt so queer as folk...

I hope it's satire but how can one tell nowadays?

Aaarrrrgh

That has got to be satire, surely?

If only I had a £1 for every time someone on here had responded to a fresh piece of lunacy with the words "This has got to be satire". (It usually isn't.)

She came home early one night and found me experimenting with her underwear.

Yes because that's the first sign of actually being a woman, trying on your wife's (or daughters') underwear. Underwear is basically all women are about. Isn't that how Kaitlyn Jenner started out?