Hi, new here and not having read all the 600 odd posts so I apologise if my point has been made already.
Is the lawyer able to argue that JY is not actually a women as a matter of fact?
Could Defendant / Lawyer not challenge the actual Transgender Ideology?
You know because of you know – actual science?
Even if they were not allowed to make this case for technical legal reasons – It would be nice if they could make a statement for the record that the Lawyer / Defendants do not accept the whole Transgender Ideology.
Before Women and Blacks got legal rights were Lawyers able to make statements for the record in Courts / Hearings that this was wrong.
I can not believe that in 2019 – we are in the same moral positions as those times again.