Fascinating tweets about JY’s waxing case. Read here. (Thread title edited by MNHQ)

[Whackitupto200]

JY’s parent sounds like an absolute loon. It would explain a lot.

threadreaderapp.com/thread/1147905523347365888.html

We have a woman who is truly oppressed by her sex being further oppressed because of her sex by someone who uses that sex to claim ultimate victimhood, which can only be done because he's not of that sex.

@GCAcademic can you explain what unprotected/ protected tweets are please? I find twitter difficult sometimes.

Been following the reporting with interest though.

I don't have the words to adequately express my disgust for JY or for the system that facilitates putting a woman through something like this. It's abhorrent. If this doesn't go the way it should it'll be devastating but you have to hope that, in that worst case scenario, it at least opens some eyes and casts some sunlight and scrutiny on this subject in Canada,

JY is ruining her life because she doesn't want to touch his fucking penis. So livid.

That's it in a nutshell, ahumanfemale.

Because JY believes in JY's role as a lightning rod for human rights reform

JY doesn’t believe this. They enjoy the attention they’re getting from the fact that they can manipulate and gaslight naive fuckwits into believing they’re doing all this for ‘humanitarian’ reasons. The fact that this monumental bullshit is being enabled by Canadian authorities is a big fucking neon sign and earsplitting klaxon as to where we’re heading if we don’t stand shoulder-to-shoulder against this.

@TheClitterati - basically her Tweets are publicly visible now, whereas for a while they were only visible to those following her:

mobile.twitter.com/goinglikeelsie

Ah thank you. I've been following her since she first started reporting which explains why I've not noticed any difference.

It feels like the men are arguing in court over whether the woman is private property (of her husband and father) or public property (Yaniv).

And when the case is settled, the woman will do as the victor directs her to do. Because of course she has no agency of her own.

@ahumanfemale your post made me well up. You're right. It was a small thing that was "hers" 😪😪😪 I'm so upset

Also (and I really don't mean this as flippantly as it may read, given my last post)

waves to Kiwi Farms thank you for all that you do on this, especially the archiving 😉

Popchyk - yep, it's one hell of an example of patriarchy in action

@Popchyk

At least the Member is the one in charge and she is a woman.

That's it, in a nutshell, Popchyk. So fucking depressing. The most "progressive" country in the world looks positively medieval.

It feels like the men are arguing in court over whether the woman is private property (of her husband and father) or public property (JY).

Spot on. I've read some of it but not all and I'm not sure I can face the rest. Someone please tell me there was a bit earlier on where her right to just not touch anyones genitals that SHE doesn't want to touch was discussed (regardless of what any man might think)?

Absolutely popchyk

Someone please tell me there was a bit earlier on where her right to just not touch anyones genitals that SHE doesn't want to touch was discussed (regardless of what any man might think)?

Unless I missed it, the entire argument revolved around (a) what her (father's) religion decrees and (b) what her husband would permit.

Maybe she doesn't want to face questions from jy.

Just going through the latest batch now.
"? So SG must be compelled to drive to and enter your personal residence, must be compelled to do so by State?
JY - yes State should compel, race/religion/culture is against LGBT"

glad this point (of JY's intent) was made clear

btw every time I see 'SG' I think 'Susie Green'

"Member tell JY to stop asking witnesses about opinion and hypotheticals. "

ha, the whole bloody thing would be over if JY stopped doing that

But there's this bit:

"purposely misgendering JY or parent. Most at hearing had some slips, including Member - was especially hard for SG - her lawyer never faltered."

It was hard for SG not to misgender. So she must have given evidence? But I can't see where. Maybe it's coming next.

I'm totally disgusted, truly, with them letting this barbaric farce carry on.

And thank God for that tweeter.

so is the parent "trans"?

I don't think so, Pope