You are/were being disingenuous In your opinion. Which you are fully entitled to have.
Funny how when evidence is provided on request it is no longer "that didn't happen" (cos obviously that isnt true), it then becomes about the quality of what was said rather than its existence. Which was what was actually denied.
You will no doubt be pleased to know that I am pissing off to bed.
Even better news, I won't be back! So that's one less poster spoiling the ambience of the echo chamber.
I have learned so much from these threads. Mostly, that some posters are so busy scrabbling to deny trans women their chosen name, that they genuinely don't realise that they come across as raging bigots, who aren't just gender critical but actively trans phobic.
That if some GC feminists come over elsewhere how they come over on here, then the aim of GC feminism is doomed to failure.
That many posters care an awful lot more about the opinion of those who already agree with them and pat them on the back, than they do about how to get the public onside with the GC aims.
That many posters place that ego massaging within the echo chamber ahead of changing things for women.
And that there are few people more disingenuous and gas lighting than those who perpetually try to accuse others of it online. I pity them. If they hate the behaviour they describe, they must hate themselves.
And that any disagreement on FWR means those disagreeing are men, TRAs, handmaidens or other lovely perjorative terms.
That the irony of some posters maintaining that those who disagree must be men as they are using "male pattern language", whilst trying to claim they are gender critical, would be hilarious if it wasn't so fucking tragic.
Mostly, that lots of posters are far more committed to obtaining the freedom to use language which marginalises, than actually protecting women.
I would say "I see you" as people on here often parrot. But it gives me no satisfaction to do so. Posters have jumped the shark so far that they simply cannot see what they have become. Sadly, a less violent mirror to the TRAs. Same level of hatred comes across. Same refusal to listen to anyone outside your own comfort zone. And the same failure to realise that the valid concerns have long been left behind, as scoring points against those who disagree matters much more.
Still, at least noone here is telling people to "die in a fire" so you have that moral high ground. Sadly, I hoped that you had a bit more than just that though. But the scales have dropped, and for most of you, it is clear that your debate increasingly mirrors that which you profess to oppose. Winner!