Munroe - Childline 's first LGBT+ campaigner.

[HandsOffMyRights]

Words fail me today

Merry - he linked to his blog in his LinkedIn profile. He's now made it private but it's about his fetish for rubber and his pervert (his word) rubber family. His Facebook/insta/linked accounts are all public.

I ambreally angry that he was involved in letter to Santa. My kids DS wrote those. They epitomises we unguarded chid innocence. And he was wanking in the toilets in his rubber while he was working on them.

FFS NSPCC.

He had a personal blog listed on his Linked in bio. That blog had a group picture of his fetish pals and some text referring to them all as ‘perverts’ (although the post was largely a tribute to a late friend).

Everything else has been connected from there - a video interview on YouTube about his childhood and his start in the fetish scene (now gone) was found via his real name, and also used his online nicknames.
No one has done any hacking or doxing, as far as I know (i wouldn’t know how to if I wanted to! I’m a middle aged mum of 3) it’s literally been one link leads to another, like a trail of rubbery breadcrumbs.

The actual video porn is on various xtube accounts, it wasn’t directly on his linked in, but that is where the trail of links begins.

nonsenceagain:
I’m still finding it difficult to believe what is unfolding here. It’s almost beyond belief.

Yes, I agree. Absolutely gobsmacked. The UK's leading charity on child protection, the NSPCC - child protection for goodness' sake - is indulging such people.... words fail me, but I feel angry about this.
What and who else could they be hiding / defending?

handsoffmyrights I actually found those photos fine (unless I've missed some?)

It's not even really the kink for me that is the problem - it's the exhibitionism of his kink, at work, in a job that demands utmost squeaky cleanness.

... Eta ... ok, it is the kink.

Part of the NSPCC's level 3 safeguarding training is understanding 'professional blindspots'. It seems that the NSPCC have been evidencing a series of these in recent months - regulatory capture, changing the definition of sexual abuse in a way that minimises it, defending the indefensible, failing to implement safeguarding practices in the work place, ineffective safer recruitment practices.

What horrifies me is less about MB or a man with no boundaries acting out his kinks in the workplace, (vile as that is). It is the hundreds of individuals defending this and shouting about homophobia and transphobia with no awareness about how this impacts on children. If this is hushed up by the media, then there is no hope.......

I ambreally angry that he was involved in letter to Santa. My kids DS wrote those. They epitomises we unguarded chid innocence. And he was wanking in the toilets in his rubber while he was working on them.

FFS NSPCC.

Oh OrchidInTheSun. That's a heartbreaking post.

The difference between the kids and this perverted fool and his enablers is stark.

But according to Owen Jones this poor person is being victimised by the nasty feminists. Does he do his research or just jump on to stuff without thought? Either way there’ll be no push back apart from some tweets which he’s blocked from his own feed. There’s not going to be an article in the Guardian or a retraction. I can’t stand the smug [insert expletive here]

The lost of trust is an issue that needs to be addressed. Santa matters. Trust in Santa matters.

I do think there should be some caution about staying definitively JM was doing things whilst in the employ of the NSPCC - unless the videos are date-stamped then it’s speculation as it seems the video title wasn’t chosen by him.

Regardless, it’s an appalling lack of judgement on JM’s part, putting his sex life online and linked to his employer. If it all has been uploaded/linked/posted in the 4 years since they first employed him perhaps the NSPCC is not quite as negligent as it first appeared - realistically although companies have social media clauses in their employment contracts , once initially vetted and past employment/probation no company keeps tabs on individual employees social media unless they’re alerted to an issue.

Whether they should have been alerted to an issue sooner is a question, of course. One of his colleagues should have recognised the LinkedIn kink stuff was inappropriate, at the least.

Well I'm off to bed.

I wonder what tripe will be served up tomorrow, that we'll all be told we have to eat without complaining.

My favourite piece of commentary so far:

The ‘at work’ video was uploaded on June 15th 2017.

OJ and also the NSPCC Twitter handlers (among others) appear to have absolutely no awareness of child protection; and also, absolutely no awareness that they themselves have no awareness of child protection, and no awareness of the importance of child protection...

I'm reading the NSPCC hashtag and right in the middle of all the tagged posts about rubber fetish and wanking some poor unsuspecting primary school has tagged a photo of children with the caption @NSPCC leading workshops for years 5 & 6.

Fair enough, then, DuMonde.

Haworthia that made me

What horrifies me is less about MB or a man with no boundaries acting out his kinks in the workplace, (vile as that is). It is the hundreds of individuals defending this and shouting about homophobia and transphobia with no awareness about how this impacts on children. If this is hushed up by the media, then there is no hope.......

Yes my thoughts too.
I periodically do a twitter search 'NSPCC' & see so many people who don't clearly dont understand/ consider Safeguarding & have given no thought for the very vulnerable children that NSPCC/Childline should be focussed on supporting.

Children & their needs are completely absent amongst the righteous indignation of so many adults' emotional reactions.

I'm relaxed about what consenting adults do privately, but among other things I'm concerned about people getting off on porn because it is filmed at the NSPCC,

It's not clear that that is what happened (don't know how old the video is, or where it was filmed), but if it's easy to find his porn videos via his LinkedIn profile, it doesn't seem unreasonable to assume that people who follow him on other channels are aware of where he works.

Oh, 2017 - thanks DuMonde.

Unless I'm being naive, of course - and that they're all well aware that they're engaging in shattering the safeguarding of children, but they just don't care. Indeed, that is their intention.

But kink-shaming workplace wankers and fetishists is "bullying", and not to be tolerated...

FFS.

What a crazy Day! You really couldn't make this madness up.

The definition of sexual abuse that's in a screen shot - is that the whole thing? Are children not being told its illegal for an adult to do anything sexual with you?

It's very strange that so many commenters seem to think the problem here is homophobia - as though we'd all be fine with the man filming himself wanking in the NSPCC toilets if he then went away and had sex with a woman.

I am not on Twitter, so curious about what is the latest regarding the NSPCC (UK official child protection agency) workplace wanker employee?

And is Munroe Bergdorf supporting them, I wonder?

The NSPCC and half of the known twitterworld appears to be fervently supporting rubberman against the bullying and bigotry unleashed against him by the bullies and bigots. The other half are either banging their heads repeatedly against the nearest wall and/or speechless with astonishment that wanking in work and posting the wank up on SM is not considered problematic. I'm in the second group by the way.