I have no problem in itself with a transwomen being used to advertise shampoo. However this:
A hair care partnership was the obvious choice, she said: it was a key signifier that she was female when she was going through her transition as a teen.
“It’s not the only thing, but it such a powerful expression of femininity,” she said.
Utter horseshit. What does Paris mean by 'a powerful expression of feminity'? Is she talking about having long flowing locks? Are women who have short hair not 'feminine'? It's just such stereotypical bollocks.
Tbf, Pantene is pretty shit anyway.