RobinMoiraWhite See this is what I mean by respect. You completely ignore the fact that women and girls have boundaries - of necessity, because our sex makes us vulnerable. We cannot fully participate in public life unless these boundaries are respected.
We suffer both systemic oppression and institutionalised discrimination because of our sex.
And because our sex lies at the root of our oppression, our rights are sex-based rights. In a patriarchal society we cannot achieve equality and equity of opportunity without single-sex set asides such as all women shortlists or hiring quotas or prizes, awards and scholarships reserved for females only.
You know this. You choose to ignore it. You advocate for an ideology that seeks to erase our single-sex set asides. You have not addressed a single one of the reasons we have given you for why we need female only spaces. Which are of course not private.
We are discussing public provisions here that exclude all members of the male sex class regardless of identification. That doesn't make these spaces private and it's utterly absurd to call them "dark".
Dark is the world we will inhabit if your ideology prevails and we lose our sex-based rights. My Muslim and Jewish friends, my friends from conservative backgrounds, all of us who are victims of male physical and sexual male violence. Our female children. Our sportswomen and girls. None of us can fully participate in public life if males who identify as trans can access our female-only set asides.