PlayYouLikeAShark I do gasp when I read about how far the transtrend has captured Scottish institutions. If I wouldn't have to do an awful lot of homework on Scottish law to be of any help, I'd lend a hand. At least you have Joanna Cherry, an a public meeting coming up with great speakers. I wonder where the Scottish GC lawyers are? Scared for their jobs?
I'm so sorry the Scotch women's sector has been well and truly captured. Are there no courageous individuals taking a leaf out of Vancouver Rape Relief's book?
It does seem that the countries - such as Canada and Scotland - which want to differentiate themselves as much as possible from their overbearing southern neighbours, are embracing the transtrend to virtue signal on a national level. Slow handclap for their shining goodness 
Re Helen Lewis, who I noticed at Monday's meeting, it's probably better than nothing to have her granting approval to this new wave of actual feminism in the New Statesman. It's been interesting to see her navigate a job in the hub of male-centred leftism, walking a tightrope.
However, I cannot discern the logic of identifying 'those nasty women over there, who won't accept that a male can be a woman under any circumstances', as contrasted with nice proper feminists who will allow some males, under certain circumstances, into the Woman Club. The only reason I can see for setting up these two categories of feminist - one nice/better, the other nasty/beyond the pale - is for the writer to distance themselves from the nasty feminists in the hope of being 'saved' instead of burned at the stake. It doesn't work though, does it? It just leads to a watered-down, toothless liberal type of fem-lite. Women need to be able to see what's happening and to think clearly about it. I doubt Lewis' piece helps with that.
The fundamental point, in this political conflict, is that as soon as you allow any males to belong within the category 'Woman,' the word loses meaning, and you have to invent a new one to describe adult human females as a social grouping. No intellectual worth their salt can swerve that linguistic issue without looking a bit...compromised, and confused about what is actually at stake.