Nope, Amber Rudd did not say "women of colour". If Amber Rudd had said "women of colour', which is the correct, woke term, then somebody in the media may have actually listened to what Amber Rudd was saying, i.e., advocating in support of women who receive twitter abuse, which includes racist as well as sexist abuse and threats in the case of Diane Abbot and other "women of colour". Which is, incidentally, one of the few times Amber Rudd has made any useful contribution to the lives of women of colour.
No, Amber Rudd said "coloured women". A term used by "people of colour" themselves well into the 1980s and 1990s (people like my parents), until somebody told them they were wrong and oppressing themselves. So instead of discussing the substance of her remarks, the media discussed the fact that AR must be a rampant racist. And the point she was making is conveniently lost, because the woke love to tell "people of colour" they are oppressed without wanting to actually help do anything about it of substance.
As exhibit 1, please look up on Youtube the exchange on LBC between John Barnes and Sheilagh Fogarty on LBC. JB saying "so what, many people in the non white community still say coloured people, why don't you listen to what AR was trying to say about Twitter abuse instead of focussing on a terminology that many people it's supposed to oppress find completely innocuous; SF more or less insisting that JB and the previous (black, female) caller don't understand their own oppression. Oh and accusing JB of being aggressive (when he was just being exasperated). But that's an old trope isn't it, the aggressive black man; just like the black man = stupid at the top of this thread.
So there we go, closet racists can remain woke, because they would never dream of saying the P word or the N word to your face, they will use the correct terminology - but they still won't sit next to you on the bus though.