Rachel McKinnon is "femalephobic"

[andyoldlabour]

I came across this on McKinnon's twitter feed, and it screams out that McKinnon is a mysoginist and woman hater.

"Uh...no, women's bathrooms/change rooms are dangerous because of cis women"

twitter.com/rachelvmckinnon/status/1094361173963624448

RM is scared of women in the toilets... You couldn’t make this shit up!

Well if RM finds female safe spaces unsafe, RM can always use the male spaces or find third trans spaces to use and leave us to our unsafe female safe spaces.

It almost looks like some of these people won't be happy until women are removed from female spaces...

Love the groveling, cringing apology to McKinnon from the person who originally made the comment about cis men being a threat - 'so sorry, didn't mean to presume, I can delete my tweet if it caused any pain, so sorry, as penance I shall lash myself 100 times with this cat o'nine tails made from the radiant brave locks of transwomen, so sorry...'

It's ridiculous how scared these woke folk of Twitter are.

I will happily support RM in any campaign for safe (ie well designed) any-sex third spaces.

I was quite cross with myself the other day in a museum when it was only after having queued in the women's loos (while DH was straight in and out of the men's, of course) that I noticed the 'any gender' loo, which as far as I could see no one was actually using.

"RM is scared of women in the toilets... You couldn’t make this shit up!"

Well you can understand it, the poor mite is only six feet tall, weighing just over fourteen stones

I don’t know how she leaves the house everyday! Must be so traumatising all these people everywhere...

LOL. DH in unisex loos last night, terrorised by slightly drunk women in the hand washing area, cheerfully adjusting their tights and underwear while he was queuing for a loo.
He was shaken I tell you. Shaken.

Quaking in their size 11's, poor dear.

I do like the fact unisex toilets means men are more likely to wash their hands!

Well DH is a hand washer but I suspect he ran last night.

Rachel needs a safe space away from horrible biological women.
I'm good with that.

Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender. We recognise it and nod sagely to each other.

It may just have dawned on McKinnon that every so-called 'victory' on the race-track will be greeted by boos, jeers and shouts of 'cheat'. DARVO is the only weapon left in a backlash that threatens a brave and stunning cycling career.

The more McKinnon whines, the more people see through this tactic.

Panic button?! ❄️ AF

I mean, Rachel wears a panic button to work

I think I may have just sprained my eyeballs.

I’m blocked. I regard this as a badge of honour.

I am blocked too but I do follow, like retweet a lot of GC people. Not remotely bothered. Funny how they all like to live in such a vacuum of absolute submission! I have not blocked anyone...

A combination of rhetorical DARVO and real wish to remove women (ahf) from every space

It almost looks like some of these people won't be happy until women are removed from female spaces

So some men who believe they are women, think they are at risk from us in the female toilets, but don’t want a third space for trans people? I’ve an idea! 💡 Why don’t we have a third space to keep the nasty ‘transhopes’ away from the poor delicate little transwomen? All the transwomen and woke women can share the female space and us nasty ‘terfs’ can use the third space. That way they are safe from us and we are duly ‘chastised’ by not being able to share with them. Surely they wouldn’t have a problem with that?

Where did Rachel get her PhD, in a packet of cornflakes? It would be a complete embarrassment to be associated with such slack-witted thinking.

Not safe in men’s loos, not safe in women’s - what’s a transwoman to do?

I know! How about a 3rd space just for tw?
They don’t want a 3rd space, they want ours but now preferably without us apparently.
Um, ok so let them have ours and we’ll get a 3rd space for just us then?
No sorry, that would be transphobic and exclusionary.
Right, so we can’t do right for doing wrong then?
Yep, you got it.

Where did Rachel get her PhD, in a packet of cornflakes? It would be a complete embarrassment to be associated with such slack-witted thinking.

Since you ask... Rachel's doctoral thesis from the University of Waterloo (Ontario, Canada)

'Rachel McKinnon (2012). Reasonable Assertions: On Norms of Assertion and Why You Don't Need to Know What You're Talking About'

uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/handle/10012/6619

What an apt thesis title, since Rachel clearly doesn't have a scooby what they are talking about 90% of the time.

Rachel McKinnon (2012). Reasonable Assertions: On Norms of Assertion and Why You Don't Need to Know What You're Talking About

Lol
It is well established that men cite their own work far too often.
And of course Rachel cites Rachel's own work.

Obviously.

WarpedGalaxy That sounds like stalking, to me.

Stalking? Wtf?