Jean Hatchet, new blog post

[SugarPlumFairy99]

jeanhatchet.blogspot.com/2019/01/why-i-wont-be-standing-up-for-women.html

This blog post from Jean is eye-opening. Working alongside anti-abortion, hard right groups undermines decades of feminism.

Shame on Posie. I agree with Jean, I will also be sitting down for women.

I stand for Jean, for Posie, and for ALL women who are fighting for our rights. Right wing, left wing, religious, atheist, rich, poor... I don't care. We stand together.

This reminds me a little bit of the time Dittany unfortunately parted company with MN (and some other private places)

Gosh, I don't know what to say other than that if you think it is okay to join up with an openly anti-feminist organisation, you are not acting in women's best interests, whatever you think. You are fuelling a dangerous fire and giving support to a very destructive movement. I obviously can't convince anyone otherwise, but I am glad that a lot of GC people on twitter do get it and agree.

If you're disenfranchised with the left and want to join the right, be my guest. Also, Posie sounds like an absolute peach from Jean's blog. Disagree with her and she stops speaking to you. Lovely.

Disagreement does not mean lack of integrity.

Joining forces with the far-right or defending it does though...

Twitter itself is openly anti-feminist. What the hell are you all doing there? Naughty bad feminists

That transcript is hugely helpful - thank you Pencils.

I think it’s good that discussions can be had and differences between feminists tolerated. As far as I can see, the whole idea of ‘I stand with X’ has been very much a recent phenomenon of deciding your identity based on a simplistic image of ‘good’ vs ‘bad’ and as such part of the identity politics which has enabled debate to become so toxic and devoid of real content and argument.

TRAs seem to have one line and one opinion and if you deviate from the dominant belief (TWAW etc) you are automatically a bigot. It is the mark of a religion or rather a cult and it shows how immature and unjustifiable their arguments are. We don’t all have to agree with each other and in fact I think we’re more powerful because we don’t try to pretend we do. We still work for the advancement of or support women in general, even if not as individuals, unlike this silly modern idea that if we criticise another woman we are being a bad feminist and we should just say nice things to all women because we’re a sisterhood.

Working with different groups is a decision each woman has to make for herself and I respect both Posie’s and Jean’s opinions on where they’ve drawn the line. Maybe I don’t agree with how it’s been written about but to the TRAs’ disappointment that doesn’t mean I am tearing down and splintering feminism. Just like the ‘right and wrong side of history’ false concept, actual issues, ideas and politics are more complicated than the TRAs even seem capable of grasping.

I don't like KH at all but I agree with her on trans issues and free speech and was glad when she tweeted quite a bit about women's sport as she has nearly a million followers. The left are completely ignoring the concerns of women, so if somebody like David TC Davies will actually meet with women, if 'shock jock' types will get the word out, I'll take the help from wherever it comes tbh.

Gosh, I don't know what to say other than that if you think it is okay to join up with an openly anti-feminist organisation, you are not acting in women's best interests, whatever you think. You are fuelling a dangerous fire and giving support to a very destructive movement.

Thank you, Oxy, for all the pertinent Dworkin earlier.

I posted the link to the Hands Across the Aisle panel on Youtube upthread. It is about an hour long and really worth a watch. The situation may be different in the UK; perhaps women there will be able to stop the erasure of female sex-based rights with leftist allies alone, but here in the U.S. I believe that is simply not possible.

I have voted Democratic ever since I was eligible to vote; I have walked precincts, made phone calls, written letters, met candidates. And in 2019 it is completely taboo in Democratic spaces to say that woman = adult human female. The Equality Act is on almost no one's radar right now, but all major Democrats are onboard. If they win (and I have to work for that, because the only alternative is Trumpian/GOP nihilism) gender identity will be enshrined in federal law, overriding sex.

Obviously the right wing wants to divide the left on this issue. But it is a real division, not a false propagandized one!

As more women become aware of the impact on our rights, more women will speak out. I just want it all to come out now, in 2019, and lance the boil so that our candidates can work out their positions critically rather than march blissfully, knee-jerkedly on the side of genderist ideology right up until it hammers them in November 2020.

I like them both

Joining forces with the far-right or defending it does though

Nobody is suggesting joining forces with the far right or defending it. We are talking about women having nuanced, sometimes overlapping points of view.

If you're disenfranchised with the left and want to join the right, be my guest

Why does it have to be either or? Why does being disenfranchised by the left make you no longer left wing? The opinions of left and right wing women sometimes overlap. Why is this problematic?

When did women finding common ground stop being a cause for celebration?

Obviously the right wing wants to divide the left on this issue

and in the UK, TRAs want to divide women on this issue.

Its almost as if there's something in common....

lots of trans people and allies warned you about dodgy allies. We told you, we told you, we told you.

Dodgy allies, you say? Shall we really go down that path?

Yeah dodgy allies when I saw so many TRAs crowing about Meghan Murphy being banned from twitter and not a word on the individual who 'achieved' it.

lots of trans people and allies warned you about dodgy allies. We told you, we told you, we told you.

I can't decide if this is more childish than arrogant or more arrogant than childish.

Anyway, in my opinion t only speaks of the person chosing to write this.

'We' were also warned by a gun-toting 'left-wing' nazi-hunting transwoman a couple of days ago.

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3487089-Trans-activist-shares-their-activism-tactics

If you're disenfranchised with the left and want to join the right, be my guest

The left are offering us up on a plate to men and so some of us want to work, on this issue, with people on the right. This left=good right=bad stuff is childish and unintelligent crap.

This makes me annoyed. I am not very good at verbalising my arguments, but I feel that somehow it is hugely unfair that Stonewall receives millions from unknown sources whilst gender critical feminists are stuck making deals with the devil in order to make their voices heard.

To be clear, Funky didn't say the thing about dodgy allies. It was a different person upthread but I forgot to respond earlier.

Either we're a hive mind in an echo chamber, or 'the movement' has been irrevocably damaged by a discussion.
There is no one movement and that's one reason why it cannot be harmed by being associated with one event or individual.

Women are as always held to much higher standards than anyone else. Impossibly high standards.

It still beats dying on Rapist Hill.

None of you remember a certain actress popping up in Hollywood a decade or so ago trying to make her mark.

She had a good shot, until she wore a white supremacy, confederate flag on her ass to a party. She thought her shorts said "rebel."

US politics are not like UK politics.

This left=good right=bad stuff is childish and unintelligent crap.

Could not agree more. Tribalism and outsourcing of thinking it responsible for the entire shit show that is the 21st century so far.

Jean for everything you have ever done for women.

Posie you too

AWA some for you too, you have inspired so many, many women to get up off their arses, join the sisterhood, engage in politics, recognise that the patriarchy is alive and kicking and fight to preserve and improve rights for the next generation.

I feel that somehow it is hugely unfair that Stonewall receives millions from unknown sources whilst gender critical feminists are stuck making deals with the devil in order to make their voices heard.

Stonewall funding is unfair and its hardly ethical, left wing, free trade money!
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3488261-The-Financial-Juggernaut-that-is-Stonewall

There's all sorts of grassroots groups & action happening in the UK. Women can make their voices heard simply by standing up in large numbers.

See thread:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3470743-The-ReSisters-movement-is-growing

MsVanillaRoseAuntof7 Hate to say this (no, I don't), but lots of trans people and allies warned you about dodgy allies. We told you, we told you, we told you

Hahahahahahaahahahaaaaahahahaha! Classic. "The trans people" ( featuring more crappy stereotypes than Pans People) have so many dodgy allies, vast swathes of women have been silenced, no platformed, threatened with violence, their jobs threatened, barred from public spaces, their views misrepresented and lied about, refuges beleagured.

Your tedious smuggery is expected. JH is entitled to her views as is PP. I support all women. Just do what you can.

I’m not originally from the UK, but I’ve found your class system and your divisive politics very different and far more divisive than Aotearoa- although it’s changing there and a lot more polarising these days. Guess which issue has helped to do that.

She had a good shot, until she wore a white supremacy, confederate flag on her ass to a party. She thought her shorts said "rebel."

It didn't hurt Kanye though, or Ludacris, Kid Rock, Axl Rose, Andre 3000, Lynyrd Skynyrd. The politics may be different but women being held to higher standards is the same I guess.