Miranda Yardley calls out the predator

[Nudibranch]

mirandayardley.com/en/jonathan-yaniv-is-a-predator

Ythat is the best response from Miranda. Superb.

Why is this person protected?

Why was Savile?

You cannot use trans rights as an excuse to hide from prosecution.
When this has been done before it didn’t end well for anyone.

Is the rest of the trans community, other than Miranda, calling JY out?

If not, why not, as JY is doing their cause no favours.

Miranda going Private Eye in the comments!

I wish to refer you under UK Law to the response in Arkell v Pressdram (1971).

I'll be laughing about that all day!

This creature needs to be owned by those advocating for this creature to have unfettered access to women and girls. This creature belongs to them.

I’ve read a couple of pages on that Kiwi farm thread and was surprised to see people on there referring to T*RFS still. I just don’t understand how, while reading all this vile stuff, they can still maintain that women pointing out the obvious problem with self ID that Yaniv so clearly demonstrates are bigots/should DIAF etc. The cognitive dissonance required is making my brain hurt.

Kudos to you, Miranda. And I'd like to take this opportunity to say, in general, how much respect I have for you. You are terrific.

JY should be in prison. WTF is going on in Canada at the moment?

#MeghanMurphyRocks is a hashtag.

#IStandWithMartina is another one.

So, why is nobody in the trans community other than Miranda (who TRAs think is one of Satan's minions) calling this guy out? He's not a fragile little lamb in need of protection, he's a predator.

Also, why is the BC Human Rights Commission not reassessing their support for him and refusal to provide relevant information about his lolsuits to the women being sued for refusing to wax his balls in light of the ever growing mountain of evidence that he's not a sad lady who just wants nice smooth balls, he's a predator?

Thank you Miranda!!
I have no idea why this person is somehow so important that they are being protected whilst anyone that points out the obvious is in trouble.

Has the world learnt nothing from Jimmy saville

It's beautiful to watch. JY is doing so much for the GC cause. So is McKinnon.

"Because Canada, Jonathan got to remain anonymous in his 'human rights' lolsuits. However one of Jonathan's victims looked him up on the internets and found.....

some of Jonathan's creepy social media caps, so they filed to cancel Jonathan's anonymity. In response, Jonathan dropped that one lolsuit, but left the other fourteen."

From the Kiwi farms thread.

Anyone know how it is going for the other 14 waxers? They must surely have been able to find this information and act likewise? I feel really sorry for them. I understand some of them are one person businesses, at least one working from home. I really hope they have support.

Am starting to wonder if West Yorkshire police have any connections with the police in Canada. This situation is so ludicrous that it beggars belief.

A big thank you to Miranda, though.

Esther Betts (the masked protester who wrote about being wrong to try and shut down debate and inimate women) has tweeted about this

Esther Betts
@elmskid
I'm looking up this Jonathan/Jessica Yaniv guy, all I have to say at the moment is that as a trans woman I've never been this obsessed with 10 year olds having periods, this isn't a characteristic of trans women.

Esther Betts
@elmskid
I'm concerned about JY becoming a figure in the trans rights movement, I can forsee that people will latch onto them simply because they have succeeded in upsetting radfems. But as trans people we should be just as concerned about someone who is almost certainly a predator

Nicely done Miranda!

I just don't understand how he is getting away with his behaviour, really boggles the mind.

Well done Miranda. He's a danger to young girls and women.

He can't have a limitless bank balance though, threatening legal action everytime someone says "no" to him or calls him out.
I'd like to know how those other cases are going.

I can forsee that people will latch onto them simply because they have succeeded in upsetting radfems. But as trans people we should be just as concerned about someone who is almost certainly a predator*

Gosh, this really presents a dilemma for the TRAs, doesn't it? Do they a) support an obvious sexual predator on the basis that he upsets feminists or b) not support him because he's an obvious sexual predator?

What a difficult decision. If anyone wanted evidence of the moral vacuity of many TRAs, look no further.

It would be useful if Yaniv tried to sue someone in the UK, and lost because the judges ruled that it was in the public interest for people to know what was going on.

That would make it a lot more uncomfortable for Canada to maintain the shit they are up to.

And it might focus minds in the UK about proposed changes to the law here.

So I hope Miranda is happy to be sued and is sued. Cos I think Miranda would win and it would be glorious.

It's also why Miranda WONT be sued.

Do legal authorities/police not maintain lists of known grifters? If not they should. The individual in this case is also suing the company that own his mum's senior residences because supposedly they were cleaning the lifts with toxic chemicals (in Canada? not likely) and the custodian told Yaniv that he shouldn't be there (presumableybecause he's not a senior citizen, but of course Yaniv is insinuating because transphobia).

Not sure what the custodian not being white has to do with anything, but Yaniv seems to have quite the unhealthy fixation on people whose racial background he doesn't approve of.

He can't have a limitless bank balance though, threatening legal action everytime someone says "no" to him or calls him out.

I would dispute that. I would bet there are people with deep pockets who would support Yaniv if it suits their own agenda.

I'm still waiting for a response from twitter regarding my ban for calling him a dangerous paedophile. I've asked if they think his language towards and about children.

I'm looking up this Jonathan/Jessica Yaniv guy, all I have to say at the moment is that as a trans woman I've never been this obsessed with 10 year olds having periods, this isn't a characteristic of trans women.

Well, according to Esther's ideology, it's a a characteristic of this one "trans woman" and could perfectly well be a characteristic of many more. And the reason why we segregate by sex is to protect women and girls from the male people who have this characteristic.

Can't have your cake and eat it, Esther.

Gosh, this really presents a dilemma for the TRAs, doesn't it? Do they a) support an obvious sexual predator on the basis that he upsets feminists or b) not support him because he's an obvious sexual predator?

Yes, just where are they? You can't fart on Twitter as a woman without somone accusing you of being a bigot. Where are all the posts calling everyone liars and how it wouldn't be news without the T status.

Someone must have something to say

I've never been this obsessed with 10 year olds having periods, this isn't a characteristic of trans women.

Exactly Esther. No one ever said it was. But this is what we’ve been telling you all along - it’s not really the trans women. We aren’t saying all transwomen are predators. we are saying that the changes you want to the law will open the door to predators like yaniv.

Do you understand now? Nobody here hates transwomen. Everybody here is aware that every predator who has these kind of fixations is going to use self ID to access women and kids.

If you weren’t so self centered, and if you didn’t assume the dramatic ‘everything is about memememe ‘ stance, this would have been blindingly obvious.

I also note that Esther referred to JY as a "guy"

Are we allowed to not respect someone's gender identity if they're a predator, Esther? Or are they no longer a transwoman once they do something horrible, because no real transwoman would do that?

No true Scotswoman.

According to this study, in which all referrals for gender reassignment in Oxfordshire were required to be considered for approval by a therapist first, 2 of 38 males referred over the five year period were found to want reassignment as a way of getting intimate contact with minors - ie, were paedophiles. These were the ones not clever enough to hide it from the therapist.

www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/6B5F217162ABD9B3189F2EB82787034E/S1758320900012695a.pdf/gender_reassignment_5_years_of_referrals_in_oxfordshire.pdf