In a news article Natalie's sister said that Natalie told her he was into rough sex.
The man said it was Natalie that was into rough sex and it was accepted without question. I don't understand why.
I also can't see what the reasonable explanation for pouring bleech in her face was.
He also admits that she was talking nonsense and practically unconscious when she requested he use the carpet cleaner. I'm confused as to why that's not rape with an object. No woman would request that in her right mind. No man would do it unless he was sadistic and abusive.
All the evidence points to a deliberate act of violence against Natalie. He gave inconsistent and unbelievable excuses and the judge just accepted it as true.