I do feel a bit upset about this - I suppose the youngsters would say I'm feeling triggered. Can this possibly be the way it looks? Of course I think it's OK for the police to pursue allegations of malicious communication, but this on the face of it doesn't seem understandable - as a pp said, surely the investigation could start with a review of the communication involved and whether it could be considered malicious?
I sat in my bedroom with furniture pushed up against the door and called 999 in fear of my life because a psychotic family member with a knife was downstairs, and was told to contact the mental health services, the police wouldn't come out to me. (They've since apologised). Resources are limited. Someone has to decide what gets prioritised and what gets studied. Who is making those decisions?
I've got no interest in 'flooding' the police with reports, I think that's daft. Should we be aiming to agree with a more right-wing analysis that the entire concept of hate crime that the State has an interest in prosecuting is flawed? I'm seeing the point right now, for sure.