johnny is love that study too!
Angry totally not! I don’t think I explained myself properly, sorry!
So I am saying I think that there is a possibility that let’s say miniberyl is an instinct, as pp mentioned that everyone has to look after someone more vulnerable.
I wonder whether this instinct is expressed differently in males than in females as it is in the animal kingdom ? We both look out for the vulnerable but we turn selfless as females and the males do something else ? Protective ? Donno..
I do wonder wonder whether our mini baryls was abused ? By men who behave less like adults and more like big babies?
Perhaps we allowed them to be like big babies? We spoilt them and smothered them like we did our own babies ?
Perhaps it’s not that we need to get rid of our beautifully compassionate beryl? But we need to stop perceiving men as babies? And we need to stop being doormats to our own kids?
Perhaps the issue of society - injustice and family breakdowns- has stunted the growth of our inner child and we seem to be only relating to others, even adults, by communicating with their inner child too?
And now I’m gonna spell out something controversial...
Do you think that in our pursuit of rebelling against patriarchy and suffrage, we might’ve unintentionally, become attracted to males who seem least threatening, hence causing some natural selection to men who behave as vulnerable babies ?
In essence, I don’t want to hold my Beryl responsible alone... I don’t want to divorce my Beryl. I feel part of it is beautiful.
I feel like, we might’ve just allowed mini Beryl to be abused and go into slave labor. Its the abuse and slave labor that I want to be angry about, and I don’t want to blame patriarchy for it like a helpless being.. I should’ve known how to stand up for her better too?
Does that make sense ?