Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Oxford Student newspaper doxes Twitter account by possible criminal unauthorised use of a comptuer system

244 replies

QuietContraryMary · 26/10/2018 14:29

Heads up.

www.oxfordstudent.com/2018/10/26/transphobic-tweets-linked-to-oxford-sociology-professor/

"The Twitter account, named Henry Wimbush and still online at the time of publication, has been tweeting statements such as “transphobia is a word created by fascists, and used by cowards, to manipulate morons” since first Tweeting in January.

"it was found that the account in question could be linked to a partial phone number and Yahoo! email using freely available data and by making use of Twitter’s various functions. The Yahoo! email itself is also linked to a phone number ending in the same numbers as those previously identified, while also revealing that it is connected to the" [partially redacted email]

How this hack works:

go to twitter.com/login

click 'forgotten your password'

type in your username, or a third party's username

you will get a message something like this:

We found the following information associated with your account.
Text a code to my phone ending in 12.
Email a link to ab*********@a.**

Note that:

  • the last digits of the phone number can be used to tie your account to any phone number, since there are obviously 100 different combinations, so if it matches a phone number known by the doxer, it essentially identifies you
  • I'm not clear exactly how much information is given on email addresses in every case, but at a minimum you get the first two letters of the username (before the @), the first two letters of the domain name (the bit after the @), and the exact length of both parts of the address.

So for example, if you signed up, anonymously, to Twitter using the email address justine*@mumsnet.com, then it would show to any attacker ju******@mu.** if they tried to recover it in order to dox the owner.

The use of this feature in order to dox people most likely constitutes an offence under the Computer Misuse Act s1 as the use of this feature to dox people is clearly not authorised by Twitter, and I would encourage those affected to report the people involved to the police.

Hence I am not repeating the criminally obtained dox of the person, and I would encourage people NOT the repeat the name in this thread.

Note that this doxing follows quite soon from Aimee Challenor boasting of outing Miranda Yardley's Twitter account using the same means.

Whether there are more serious offences committed is hard to say, as the doxing itself is obviously a preparatory act to having people fired, harassed, threatened, family & children harassed, and so on, but the doing so is not necessarily planned by the original doxer so it would be hard to prove a more serious offence.

I would advise those who are on Twitter and are not using their real name to create a gmail/yahoo/other anonymous webmail account, matching the twitter username (so if you are @ARealRadFem on Twitter, make a yahoo mail account [email protected]). In terms of the phone verification that's a little trickier as the 1/100 last two digits is VERY outing if they have a suspicion who you are, but otherwise completely useless. I have had some luck in the past with adding an extra digit (so if you are 07812 456789, you can add an extra digit on like this 07812 4567890, and verification phone calls still work), but YMMV on that.

OP posts:
R0wantrees · 26/10/2018 17:01

Have you read much Orwell Orange?

FermatsTheorem · 26/10/2018 17:01

Anyway whatever else we take away from this thread I hope we can assume that Orange is not reading physiology.

Melanippe · 26/10/2018 17:02

Have you read much Orwell Orange?

They appear to be an expert

CuriousaboutSamphire · 26/10/2018 17:02

Your choice of words... starting, but not restricted to your opinion that his tweets are disgusting and that he should expect to be brought to book for them! It sort of suggests that he has done wrong and should be punished.

That is what you said...

Melanippe · 26/10/2018 17:02

Anyway whatever else we take away from this thread I hope we can assume that Orange is not reading physiology.

Or history or psychology.

Charliethefeminist · 26/10/2018 17:03

Henry Wimbush is a star, whoever he is.

QuietContraryMary · 26/10/2018 17:03

Hmm
I looked through this and my belief is that @MrHenryWimbush was not targeted. There is nothing exceptional in terms of what he tweeted to distinguish his account from 100s of others. Nor did he out himself.

Rather it appears that Kilgore/other TRAs worked through a long list of accounts systematically. It was the format of @HenryWimbush's Twitter email that led to him being doxed, not anything that he said.

OrangeStudent comments here show this. They sincerely believe they are Simon Wiesenthal hunting Nazis, and they will do it one by one to literally every single critical voice.

OP posts:
FermatsTheorem · 26/10/2018 17:04

I worry that there are students who think 1984 was an instruction manual (after all Goldsmiths students seemed to think Gulag Archipelago was).

CuriousaboutSamphire · 26/10/2018 17:04

Orange probably is doing Post Post Modern Sociology.

TheCountessofFitzdotterel · 26/10/2018 17:04

Oxford has always been an unusually insular place so I suppose it's no surprise to hear that a student weirdly believes it is a hate crime worthy of sacking a professor to state something which outside the little student bubble, almost everyone agrees with.

Nobody is going to discipline a prof for saying Lauren Hubbard is a man.

CuriousaboutSamphire · 26/10/2018 17:05

They sincerely believe they are Simon Wiesenthal hunting Nazis, and they will do it one by one to literally every single critical voice. Ah, and we shall all revert to Spartacusing... again and again and again...

R0wantrees · 26/10/2018 17:09

Dr Michael Biggs (Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Oxford and Fellow of St Cross College ) has published a number of significant articles recently. He researches social movements and collective protest.

'Attempted suicide by American LGBT adolescents'
4thwavenow.com/tag/michael-biggs/

'Suicide by trans-identified children in England and Wales'
cited in Times article
www.transgendertrend.com/suicide-by-trans-identified-children-in-england-and-wales/

'The Open Society Foundations & the transgender movement'
4thwavenow.com/2018/05/25/the-open-society-foundations-the-transgender-movement/

Free Speech At Oxford
previously linked
users.ox.ac.uk/~sfos0060/FreeSpeechOxford.pdf

AspieAndProud · 26/10/2018 17:14

Legal or not, doxxing is considered shitty behaviour, so if anybody says TRAs don’t do it I suggest people link to OrangeStudent’s defence of the practice.

AspieAndProud · 26/10/2018 17:17

Or history or psychology.

Probably doesn’t read anything apart from blogs that are pink and glittery and oh so feminine.

R0wantrees · 26/10/2018 17:19

They appear to be an expert

Not at reading literature for understanding.

pombear · 26/10/2018 17:21

I really welcome threads like this in a weird sort of way.

Because every time a righteous transactivist comes along to put us all in our transphobic-places, it's a real-time 'read-along' for lurkers who are still in that limbo place many of us used to be in.

Until you realise that these activists will not tolerate any dissent from their position.

And so many women immediately recognise through tone and type who's likely to be speaking, and doing the 'telling others what to think and do' despite this being a text medium, rather than an audio one!

AspieAndProud · 26/10/2018 17:22

Is anyone else picturing Orange as a kind of embryonic wannabe Owen Jones (only with less talent)

I’m literally picturing an orange, or a tangerine trying to big itself up.

StarsAndWater · 26/10/2018 17:28

I'm curious to know if Orange is also zealously outing the misogynistic Twitter accounts who use sexist slurs. I'm guessing not.

R0wantrees · 26/10/2018 17:29

I wonder if the orange isn't a reference to the radical libdem youth group?

That's a rhetorical question. Just musing, with head in hands.

Melanippe · 26/10/2018 17:29

Not at reading literature for understanding.

Agreed, but they do seem to think that 1984 is an instruction manual. It seems to be a thing at the moment.

Sarahconnor1 · 26/10/2018 17:32

mobile.twitter.com/TheOxStu/status/1055776814138834944

The article is going down well on Twitter.

R0wantrees · 26/10/2018 17:33

Melanpipe This is my deep concern. Without wanting to derail the thread with my long-held fears of the impact of the Primary literacy strategy and the way Literature is taught in schools, this really matters.

I'm going to take my own advice and go have a walk with the dog!

BeUpStanding · 26/10/2018 17:36

Wow, Orange, who the hell do you think you are? I wish there was something I could say that would pierce your massively inflated ego or make you rethink your pompous and sneering tone, but you seem to so gleefully revel in being vile that any attempt would clearly be futile.

I sincerely hope that you soon develop some critical thinking skills and grow out the sadistic tribalism phase you are currently in.

Misteryise · 26/10/2018 17:54

Oxford university has become intolerant of dissenting views. The union is increasingly a safe space for these little brainwashed snowflakes, as much as I despise the term. Marine Let Pen was no platformed a while back. To me her views are abhorrent, but I welcome the opportunity to dismantle them in public. Perhaps the other students need to grow a backbone, particularly our friend Orange.

Materialist · 26/10/2018 17:57

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.