Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Oxford Student newspaper doxes Twitter account by possible criminal unauthorised use of a comptuer system

244 replies

QuietContraryMary · 26/10/2018 14:29

Heads up.

www.oxfordstudent.com/2018/10/26/transphobic-tweets-linked-to-oxford-sociology-professor/

"The Twitter account, named Henry Wimbush and still online at the time of publication, has been tweeting statements such as “transphobia is a word created by fascists, and used by cowards, to manipulate morons” since first Tweeting in January.

"it was found that the account in question could be linked to a partial phone number and Yahoo! email using freely available data and by making use of Twitter’s various functions. The Yahoo! email itself is also linked to a phone number ending in the same numbers as those previously identified, while also revealing that it is connected to the" [partially redacted email]

How this hack works:

go to twitter.com/login

click 'forgotten your password'

type in your username, or a third party's username

you will get a message something like this:

We found the following information associated with your account.
Text a code to my phone ending in 12.
Email a link to ab*********@a.**

Note that:

  • the last digits of the phone number can be used to tie your account to any phone number, since there are obviously 100 different combinations, so if it matches a phone number known by the doxer, it essentially identifies you
  • I'm not clear exactly how much information is given on email addresses in every case, but at a minimum you get the first two letters of the username (before the @), the first two letters of the domain name (the bit after the @), and the exact length of both parts of the address.

So for example, if you signed up, anonymously, to Twitter using the email address justine*@mumsnet.com, then it would show to any attacker ju******@mu.** if they tried to recover it in order to dox the owner.

The use of this feature in order to dox people most likely constitutes an offence under the Computer Misuse Act s1 as the use of this feature to dox people is clearly not authorised by Twitter, and I would encourage those affected to report the people involved to the police.

Hence I am not repeating the criminally obtained dox of the person, and I would encourage people NOT the repeat the name in this thread.

Note that this doxing follows quite soon from Aimee Challenor boasting of outing Miranda Yardley's Twitter account using the same means.

Whether there are more serious offences committed is hard to say, as the doxing itself is obviously a preparatory act to having people fired, harassed, threatened, family & children harassed, and so on, but the doing so is not necessarily planned by the original doxer so it would be hard to prove a more serious offence.

I would advise those who are on Twitter and are not using their real name to create a gmail/yahoo/other anonymous webmail account, matching the twitter username (so if you are @ARealRadFem on Twitter, make a yahoo mail account [email protected]). In terms of the phone verification that's a little trickier as the 1/100 last two digits is VERY outing if they have a suspicion who you are, but otherwise completely useless. I have had some luck in the past with adding an extra digit (so if you are 07812 456789, you can add an extra digit on like this 07812 4567890, and verification phone calls still work), but YMMV on that.

OP posts:
OrangeStudent · 26/10/2018 16:39

AssassinatedBeauty Well he intentionally, repeatedly and maliciously misgendered people, such as New Zealand weightlifter Laurel Hubbard.

LangCleg · 26/10/2018 16:41

Let's go full Erdogan and sack twenty thousand teachers and professors. After all, Helen Staniland's recent polling shows 81% of the population is "transphobic" so there must be quite a few of them.

Honestly, Orange, can you even hear yourself?!

LangCleg · 26/10/2018 16:42

intentionally, repeatedly and maliciously

Purge him now!

OrangeStudent · 26/10/2018 16:42

Honestly, Orange, can you even hear yourself?!

No, because this is a text based forum and not an audio based one.

R0wantrees · 26/10/2018 16:42

Well he intentionally, repeatedly and maliciously misgendered people, such as New Zealand weightlifter Laurel Hubbard.

Hmm
Tanith · 26/10/2018 16:44

If students were in any way responsible for hacking a Professor’s account, they face being thrown out of the University for it.

We had a similarly arrogant, puffed up little fool who thought he was above the law when I worked at Reading. They took a very serious view of it.

OrangeStudent · 26/10/2018 16:46

Can't help but laugh at the idea that the ones getting thrown out of Oxford are the students lmfao

SwearyG · 26/10/2018 16:46

Orange misgendering is not a thing. Laurel Hubbard is male. Calling him by male pronouns, or indeed calling him a man is not incorrect. Accusing people of “misgendering” is sinister. One day you might value your ability to speak freely. Don’t throw it away now.

FermatsTheorem · 26/10/2018 16:48

Laurel Hubbard, like Mouncey, McInnes, Fox and a host of others are biologically male and should not be competing in women's sport. To argue for their inclusion is a form of woman hating.

OrangeStudent · 26/10/2018 16:49

SwearyG It is a thing and the University very much agrees with me on this.

R0wantrees · 26/10/2018 16:50

OrangeStudent

Can I suggest some fresh air, step away from the screen and perhaps read some books; published and bound ones would be the best place to start & Oxford has a wonderful library.

There's a reason why it was intended that students 'read' for a degree.

OrangeStudent · 26/10/2018 16:51

FermatsTheorem Wrong, arguing against their inclusion is transphobia. And thats not even the relevant part. He misgendered her, which is against University guidelines and is transphobia.

OrangeStudent · 26/10/2018 16:52

R0wantrees Oxford has lots of wonderful libraries, I know i've visited several of them.

FermatsTheorem · 26/10/2018 16:52

Is anyone else picturing Orange as a kind of embryonic wannabe Owen Jones (only with less talent)

AssassinatedBeauty · 26/10/2018 16:52

"Lmfao" - seriously, are you twelve?

"Misgendering" does not mean that it is forbidden to talk about someone's sex and whether or not it is an unfair advantage or a danger to other competitors in sport. Someone who is male bodied and an adult is a man. To call them a man is not a hate crime, it is not harassment or bullying.

SwearyG · 26/10/2018 16:53

Well done on spelling university right this time.

It’s not a thing. It’s a method of control. And I’ll quote a greater man than me in describing it as created by fascists and used by cowards to manipulate morons”.

Pronouns are sex based. Humans cannot change sex. Anyone arguing that Laurel Hubbard is anything other than a cheating man is intellectually dishonest or stupid. Which one are you?

LangCleg · 26/10/2018 16:53

13% of the population thinks Laurel Hubbard is a woman weightlifter. Stupid professors, sticking out their necks with such wildly unpopular views. Purge them. Purge them all.

LangCleg · 26/10/2018 16:55

Is anyone else picturing Orange as a kind of embryonic wannabe Owen Jones (only with less talent)

I was trying to avoid that particular image, thankyouverymuch.

R0wantrees · 26/10/2018 16:55

Oxford has lots of wonderful libraries, I know i've visited several of them.

Maybe spend more time in them? Be curious, be inspired, learn more stuff!

CuriousaboutSamphire · 26/10/2018 16:55

I do however think it is justified, but based on freedom of the press and that he should be exposed to journalistic criticism by the student paper for his didgusting conduct on twitter.

You see, you are mistaking his general comments for comments aimed at individuals. It may be against OU rules to say "Orangestudent says she is a woman but he is really a man" but, as they have confirmed, it is NOT a trangression to discuss whether men can change sex and become women, or women become men. They went further and said it would be wrong/illegal to try to shut down that discussion!

Maybe you need to drop the oh so superior attitude you are displaying here and try listening a little bit. Expand, modify, improve your education rather than remaining oddly wedded to poor science and trite soundbites!

OrangeStudent · 26/10/2018 16:56

Well done on spelling university right this time.

Imagine being so vapid of arguments, insecure in yourself and needy score points that you actually made a jab about someone accidentally misspelling a word lol

SwearyG · 26/10/2018 16:57

I’m also wondering, Orange, how you can say that the press have the freedom to misuse technology to report on Henry but that he doesn’t have the freedom to speak his sincerely held belief.

OrangeStudent · 26/10/2018 17:00

SwearyG Where did I say or even suggest that he doesn't have the right to speak/say his belief? He absolutely has that right, and I will defend his right to say said beliefs without state repercussion to the death.

However, he is not free from consequences from society and his employer. Oxford is entitled to fire him for holding views which are incompatible with their values and for conduct which goes against the Universities disciplinary policies. He is not free from being criticised for his views in the press and by students.

SwearyG · 26/10/2018 17:00

Imagine being so vapid of arguments, insecure in yourself and needy score points that you actually made a jab about someone accidentally misspelling a word lol

Imagine being so superior you ignore the bottom half of a post so you can score a cheap point. Oh and also you misuse the word vapid in order to look intellectually superior.

Bravo. Brave and stunning Grin

LangCleg · 26/10/2018 17:00

Pompous to illiterate in five pages.