Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Oxford Student newspaper doxes Twitter account by possible criminal unauthorised use of a comptuer system

244 replies

QuietContraryMary · 26/10/2018 14:29

Heads up.

www.oxfordstudent.com/2018/10/26/transphobic-tweets-linked-to-oxford-sociology-professor/

"The Twitter account, named Henry Wimbush and still online at the time of publication, has been tweeting statements such as “transphobia is a word created by fascists, and used by cowards, to manipulate morons” since first Tweeting in January.

"it was found that the account in question could be linked to a partial phone number and Yahoo! email using freely available data and by making use of Twitter’s various functions. The Yahoo! email itself is also linked to a phone number ending in the same numbers as those previously identified, while also revealing that it is connected to the" [partially redacted email]

How this hack works:

go to twitter.com/login

click 'forgotten your password'

type in your username, or a third party's username

you will get a message something like this:

We found the following information associated with your account.
Text a code to my phone ending in 12.
Email a link to ab*********@a.**

Note that:

  • the last digits of the phone number can be used to tie your account to any phone number, since there are obviously 100 different combinations, so if it matches a phone number known by the doxer, it essentially identifies you
  • I'm not clear exactly how much information is given on email addresses in every case, but at a minimum you get the first two letters of the username (before the @), the first two letters of the domain name (the bit after the @), and the exact length of both parts of the address.

So for example, if you signed up, anonymously, to Twitter using the email address justine*@mumsnet.com, then it would show to any attacker ju******@mu.** if they tried to recover it in order to dox the owner.

The use of this feature in order to dox people most likely constitutes an offence under the Computer Misuse Act s1 as the use of this feature to dox people is clearly not authorised by Twitter, and I would encourage those affected to report the people involved to the police.

Hence I am not repeating the criminally obtained dox of the person, and I would encourage people NOT the repeat the name in this thread.

Note that this doxing follows quite soon from Aimee Challenor boasting of outing Miranda Yardley's Twitter account using the same means.

Whether there are more serious offences committed is hard to say, as the doxing itself is obviously a preparatory act to having people fired, harassed, threatened, family & children harassed, and so on, but the doing so is not necessarily planned by the original doxer so it would be hard to prove a more serious offence.

I would advise those who are on Twitter and are not using their real name to create a gmail/yahoo/other anonymous webmail account, matching the twitter username (so if you are @ARealRadFem on Twitter, make a yahoo mail account [email protected]). In terms of the phone verification that's a little trickier as the 1/100 last two digits is VERY outing if they have a suspicion who you are, but otherwise completely useless. I have had some luck in the past with adding an extra digit (so if you are 07812 456789, you can add an extra digit on like this 07812 4567890, and verification phone calls still work), but YMMV on that.

OP posts:
Bonions · 27/10/2018 12:21

St Hilda’s, that once famously exclusionary college.

JustAnotherSpartacus · 27/10/2018 13:16

I followed the Henry Wimbush account for a few months on twitter. I didn't see anything weird or nasty coming from it, just normal gender critical stuff we would write here, and that most of the population would agree with. If anything, the writer was leaning on the considered, polite, side.

I would guess the writer was liberal politically, and into proper discussions where the arguments are critically examined.

Obviously I did not see every single message he wrote, but on balance of probabilities I am inclined to think this is yet another attempt by TRA's to attack free speech.

FermatsTheorem · 27/10/2018 13:21

I had a long mosey at the Henry Wimbush account and similarly thought it mostly full of GC stuff, not transphobia. As for the ridiculous assertion that the "AMAB demiboi 2+2=4" description is transphobic - I think someone is confusing satire and transphobia. Frankly the Heinz 57 genders and associated made up pronouns nonsense is ridiculous and deserves to have the piss ripped out of it (and does people wrestling with genuine dysphoria about their sexed bodies no favours at all).

Bonions · 27/10/2018 13:28

Janice Turner’s fighting the good fight

Janice Turner
@VictoriaPeckham
This isn’t journalism or an “exclusive”. It is Stasi-like policing of a lecturer’s social media which finds not “hate speech” but a different analysis of gender from the dogmatic new orthodoxy. I hope all supporters of academic freedom will condemn this. (But I doubt it. Cowards)

Yes, I implore my male peers, who uphold free speech in every other respect, to acknowledge this is totalitarianism. And women are sick of taking the vicious attacks for pointing this out.
@DAaronovitch

@Freedland

@hugorifkind

@simonjenkins4

@PCollinsTimes

@rafaelbehr

[thread here: mobile.twitter.com/VictoriaPeckham/status/1056111564330332160 ]

placemats · 27/10/2018 15:41

Shamelessly place marking because this is an incredibly interesting thread.

Datun · 27/10/2018 15:47

Orange doesn't appear to be here anymore. In that case, are they a previously banned poster? Another TRA with form on this site?

Shocked.

GCAcademic · 27/10/2018 15:51

There is no way Orange is an Oxford student, not with the level of literacy they’ve demonstrated on here.

R0wantrees · 27/10/2018 15:53

Orange said he had visited libraries in Oxford so maybe identifies as an Oxford student?

TheCountessofFitzdotterel · 27/10/2018 16:10

Orange seems pretty Oxfordy to me. They're not as clever as all that, you know.

hackmum · 27/10/2018 16:12

So, David Aaronovitch and Matthew D’Ancona are supporting Janice. Hugo Rifkind is on the fence. None of the others have responded.

GCAcademic · 27/10/2018 16:20

Philip Collins has responded to Janice, also fence-sitting on the gender issue, but condemning attack on free speech:

mobile.twitter.com/PCollinsTimes/status/1056113595354935296

Simon Jenkins no doubt values his employment at the Guardian too much to speak up.

Tanith · 27/10/2018 18:27

You don't have to be a student to visit libraries in Oxford, Rowan.

R0wantrees · 27/10/2018 18:31

I know Grin

R0wantrees · 27/10/2018 19:20

Lisa Muggeridge
'Thoughts: Higher education'

www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=200&v=GSFNE6qaqG0

JackyHolyoake · 27/10/2018 19:55

Someone needs to educate these pathetically immature Oxford students:

1998 UK Human Rights Act, Articles 9, 10 and 11:

www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/schedule/1

JackyHolyoake · 27/10/2018 20:03

Lady Justice Hale, of the Supreme Court, recently announced that, whilst one cannot discriminate against a messenger who is covered by a protected characteristic, one can reject a message s/he expresses:

www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-45789759

So everyone can reject the mantra that "transwomen are women" because it is not discriminating against any particular individual.

MrGHardy · 27/10/2018 21:13

OrangeStudent

"then you both don't understand what it means to live in a free society and clearly don't hold the courage of your convictions strong enough to stand by your views. "

But we don't live in a free society do we? The fascist trans lobby doxxes, abuses and hounds people who openly question them. That is far beyond "criticizing" someone's view. And you know that. Imagine if a TRA at a company went around spreading propaganda in secret, someone discovered who it was and the person was then fired. How berserk would the trans lobby get over that do you think? Recent polls have shown only about 1 in 5 people actually believe TWAW. You have no support in the public. All you have is a huge lobby based on lies and harassing those that do no stand against "transphobia".

R0wantrees · 28/10/2018 08:32

Sunday Times today, 'Activists thwart work on gender law reforms
Academics exploring the legalities of changing sexual identityare being harassed and threatened with violence'
(extract)
"[Selina] Todd has faced demands that she should not be considered for future membership of women’s committees because of her views on preserving women-only spaces. “First of all I was taken aback — now I feel angry,” she said.

“This feels to me like an attack on women’s rights and their right to speak. It feels like the beginning of a witch-hunt. I would like universities to strengthen academic freedom in the face of a few activists trying to stir up trouble.”

A fellow don at Oxford, Michael Biggs, another signatory of the open letter, said he had been “threatened with a formal complaint for transphobia”. (continues)
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3407331-Times-on-activists-threatening-academics

R0wantrees · 29/10/2018 12:08

Telegraph today:
'Oxford professor says 'academic freedom' is under threat after he is accused of running transphobic Twitter account'
(extract)
"Professor Biggs did not say explicitly that the account - which was suspended yesterday afternoon by Twitter - belongs to him and he could not be reached yesterday for comment.

After he was approached for comment by student reporters, Professor Biggs published a statement on his website in which he outlined his stance on transphobia.

"It is not transphobic to discuss the merits of legislation or to debate theories about sex and gender. Dictionary definitions such as ‘woman: adult human female’ and ‘lesbian: female homosexual’ are not transphobic. Nor is it transphobic to call the convicted rapist Karen White—who was placed in a women’s prison—a man," it read.

Asked to specifically comment on the university's policy on transphobia and harassment, he pointed to the university's "progressive tradition... such as ending the regulation of sub fusc according to sex."

He said he did not believe: "that gender identity supersedes sex, any more than I believe that Jesus was the son of God. Therefore I oppose any attempt by the University to establish an official doctrine on gender, just as I would oppose the imposition of a single religion or one particular position on Israel-Palestine. The enforcement of orthodoxy—often disguised as ‘diversity’—would destroy the University’s very foundation: academic freedom." (continues)

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/10/28/oxford-professor-says-academic-freedom-threat-accused-running/

New posts on this thread. Refresh page