Woman, 41, pretended to be a boy to groom a girl

[TurfClub]

Jacinta Brooks is a serial paedophile

metro.co.uk/2018/10/01/trans-woman-pretended-to-be-a-boy-to-groom-a-girl-7994533/

"Prosecutor Berenice Mulvanny said that police found screenshots of the conversation with the girl along with hundreds of child abuse pictures. Brooks gave no comment during a police interview but admitted she ‘couldn’t argue’ about being attracted to children. Miss Mulvanny said: ‘Brooks knew the girl was underage but sent her sexual messages. The defendant originally pretended to be a 14-year-old boy but soon admitted her real age.’

Why do we have to pretend he’s a woman, but not that he’s 14? Why is one demonstrable fact OK to speak, but the other bigotry?

Yep, he's a man. With a penis, XY chromosomes and paedophilic tendencies.

Wonder how many more like him will come skipping freely out of the woodwork clutching newly acquired GRCs soon?

Sarah I should add I have followed all your threads - so I know you were exonerated (police thought it was a waste of time too), your accuser then went on to stalk you, and did so in the company of yet another of those delightful cock-and-ball equipped rapists.

You have been through so much and you are one hell of a brave woman.

And Sarah
. You have the best name too

Under MN guidelines are we only allowed to refer to this paedophile as a woman?

I was at the Posie Parker meeting on Friday in Manchester. I honestly thought nothing could top the examples given by Ann Ruzylo (ex prison officer) about poor female prisoners being forced to listen to period anecdotes from what was clearly a man with whom they were incarcerated. Some of them were so gas lighted and traumatised that they asked the prison officers if the male prisoner was actually a man and the prison officers had to collude in the madness and weren't allowed to tell them.

Standing for Women meeting in Manchester , Anne Ruzylo's speech is at 28:00

Have we had a TRA-you’re-all-nasty-bigots on this thread yet to comment?

Yeahhh I won’t hold my breath.

We have to pretend a rough old middle-aged man who pretends to be a teenage boy isn't pretending to be a woman.

Please send this to your TWAW MPs for comment.

How anyone can vote for a MP that states TWAW is beyond me.

This is utter madness! Male privilege at its worst. So if I say I’m a dinosaur, I can be a dinosaur? It’s utter insanity that a man is able to say he’s a woman because he feels like it. It really goes to show that the men, and I’ve no doubt most of the people who are going along with this don’t value women at all! And I’m going to lose my shit if I’m referred to as a CIS woman! I am NOT a cis women!

Anne Ruzylo's speech November 2017

>>crimes are now logged on the "gender" the person says they are (even though it's sex that's important) and have been for some time.

Thanks for answering my question, @NothingOnTellyAgain. This is completely bonkers.

Crimes being logged on the sex a person saying they are seems like a deliberate attempt smear women. Some twisted individuals think that’s brilliant.

mobile.twitter.com/KTHopkins/status/1046826547548762114

mobile.twitter.com/KTHopkins/status/1046830248585842688

Can't stand her but she's got getting on for a million followers who will see this.

The writer of the article is getting an absolute roasting on Twitter

As is the Metro

I looked at Hopkins' Twitter feed on that and actually laughed out loud at one which said of the photo of this appalling man:

"Ze may be the face I can't forget..." (For those puzzled, think of the song "She" by Charles Aznavour, who has just died).

Sarah you are right! They keep moving the effing line. It’s not fair there is no consistency. It’s just like whichever way we turn is wrong- what every we say is right or wrong depending on how THEY feel or see it. It’s all pretence all of it. We have all been sucked along with the current. No more of this should be standing. It’s so stifling having to go along with these rediculous pronouns, it’s just going along with the lie. So sex offenders it seems we can call men but you can’t say a person who has actively worked to take apart safeguarding for women and girls, is in the public eye and advises stonewall and and has initials AC is a ... because you then get a strike. I’m bored of it all. Bored.

Humpty.

Has anyone contacted the guides about this story yet? I think it gets the point across very well

Wilhelminawonka I can just see him as a brown owl....

When we wonder why the press tiptoes round paedophiles and rapists trying to use 'preferred' pronouns etc, it's partly because of all the "work" that trans groups have done to ensure that the media and public figures are 'on side' with their interpretation of life.
Take a look at how they plan their "interactions" with media folk to ensure that the trans narrative is relentlessly positive - although I'm not sure that they thought carefully enough about the Challenors, the Jesses, the Jacintas , Karen White, Ian Huntley etc etc.

www.onroadmedia.org.uk/work/trans-media-action-phase-2/

Calm down, people. This never happens.

Who are we to deny this person their womanly identity? A woman is anyone who says they are after all...

I have repeatedly been called a bigot for talking about safeguarding.

I'll join your club, Sarah. Me too. I've even been called a bigot for pointing out that trans lobby schools guidance places TRANS children at risk by NON TRANS infiltrating abusers. MNHQ gave me a strike for doing just that and I had to argue for a fortnight before they rescinded it.

Any individual's "rights" end where safeguarding begins. My rights. Your rights. Trans people's rights. If that makes me a bigot then I'm a proud bigot.

And I'm still outraged on your behalf for what you have been put through.

sceptical

Very interesting

Any individual's "rights" end where safeguarding begins. My rights. Your rights. Trans people's rights. If that makes me a bigot then I'm a proud bigot.

This.

I spent years in charge of safeguarding and am astonished on a daily basis at what I'm seeing - the total dismantling of it by organisations, tacitly supported by the government, to appease a group of activists.

Luckily Fair Play For Women were ahead of the game on this one. Shame Jacinta wasn't available for the video shoot.