From the article, this bit appears particularly useful:
"So, to get down to it. The discourse of ‘homophobia’ fundamentally relies on the idea that gay-people are discriminated against on the basis of moral disgust. And inside that are two more interwoven ideas. One, that moral disgust is not a legitimate basis for telling people what not to do. (Correct) Especially not when your disgust-feels are causing serious harm to other people. (Also correct) And even more especially given that moral disgust is a nasty, vicious emotion that tends to shade very easily into violence (and I mean that in the old-fashioned sense of ‘literal violence’). Two, that because discrimination against homosexuality was entirely mediated by moral disgust, there was, in fact, no legitimate basis for that discrimination, and all objections were, effectively, moral disgust in drag. That is, the success of gay rights was substantially down to disseminating the idea that that were no good reasons for anyone to object to their agenda, and that everyone objecting was just a nasty evil bigot whose ideas shouldn’t be given any weight as part of democratic political debate."
Actually, the whole article. I hope more people read it. I am not disgusted by transpeople, but I def am very afraid of random dicks anywhere near me when I'm getting undressed or otherwise vulnerable. And EVERYBODY has the right to set limits on who gets to share space them when they are naked and vulnerable.
I'm sorry, anybody who would compel me to relax my boundaries is just an abuser. Transpeople, I'm looking at YOU.