- L Madigan claiming to be Savile's apprentice.
- S Faye thinking schoolgirls should "suck dick and get tits early".
- J Bradley flashing and reblogging images of child-aged cartoon characters being raped.
- A Challenor dating a man who dresses as a baby for sexual purposes, despite having a father who dressed as a child to rape a little girl. There is no way that AC is ignorant of said lover's fetish and, even if AC doesn't participate, AC has remained within the relationship and so endorses that fetish (in the "what you walk past without challenging is what you accept" sense of endorse).
- Edward Lord endorsing a paedophile apologist who was in PIE "for research purposes" (pull the other one, it has bells on).
All the above have sought to undermine single-sex provision, which is used to safeguard women, girls, and boys too young to use men's facilities alone.
All the above have, as listed, expressed or demonstrated worrying sexual attitudes or behaviours with regard to actual children or men with fetished ideas of children.
"Once is an accident, twice is a coincidence, three times is a pattern." We have FIVE prominent TRAs demonstrate or express worrying attitudes about children whilst undermining the safeguarding function of single-sex spaces. This is not a coincidence, this is an irrefutable pattern.
And only FWR are refusing to be wilfully blind to this. No wonder they want to shut us down.