Thank you Bespin for addressing a question. I have a couple more, if that's OK, but I appreciate you engaging in the discussion.
(NB I'm off to bed, so I won't be ignoring you after this post, just hopefully asleep.)
I would suggest anyone who is living full time in there role as evidenceed by documentation in there name eg bank card driving license passport is the point when someone is afforded those rights. is that a rasonable answer
You've mentioned upthread being worried about being sexually assaulted (I presume by males, as you related it to being on a male ward) are you not also worried by any relaxing of guidelines that would put you, as a transwoman, at risk from more males?
Is the risk not likely to be increased by:
a) Wonkiness of the 'Living in role' describer - so being able to change documents = living in role? I think a ManFriday poster was able to change their driving licence from female to male with a simple form. Is that 'living in role'?
My documents show I'm female, but most of the stuff I do and present as day-to-day would be indivisible from how you'd describe a male as 'living in their role'. How would I prove I'm female to those who hold the decision power of documentation? With the relaxation towards self-ID, what does 'living in their role'' even mean?
b) Right now, with the current legal rights, there's a process that transexuals go through to ensure most legal documentation is changed with some checks and balances from unbiased assessors.
Are you happy with the status quo?
Or are you pro-self-ID, and keen to make it easier for people to change all of their legal documents with less checks and balances from those assessors?
How would this change reduce your risk as a transwoman from being assaulted by males? Surely it would increase it?