I was thinking - according to various unsubstantiated online rumours and the contents of the Exhibitionizm blog, JB doesn’t fit either of Blanchard’s types.
JB certainly isn’t your average well-passing, straight acting (formerly super feminine gay man) HSTS, nor are they the typical once hyper masculine, late transitioning, overly sexy attired AGP (the male-bodied lesbian/pseudo-bisexual* type).
It’s generally been noted that AGPs are transitioning much earlier than they used to, but JB doesn’t really sit there either due to the lack of interest in sexualised feminity and what seems to be a sexual predilection for younger (appearing!) men.
Does this mean that there is a new, third type? Or is this genuinely a case of ‘no true transwomen’? Is it possible that JB’s real interest in the title of ‘woman’ is as a predators disguise? After all, everyone knows that women are statistically less likely to be sex offenders and are utilised by society as safeguarded/gatekeepers to protect the vulnerable.
We know that predators select and train for careers that put them directly in touch with their intended targets and spend years ‘undercover’ grooming potential prey. We know that ‘flashing’ is a crime that escalates.
Anyone associated with JB or their multiple organisations, trans or otherwise, needs to have a really good think about any red flags they might’ve missed, report anything they come up with to the authorities and totally distance themselves.
Up here, a local Tory councillor, a TEACHER, was recently convicted of child pornography possession. His ‘circle of associates’ included another Tory councillor in a different part of the country.
I know damn well that Not All Trans Are Like This - I have trans friends and am careful to pay attention to trans voices in this debate - but sex offenders are bloody everywhere, so for crikeys sake, don’t let them shelter under your umbrella if you can avoid it!