Jess Bradley, suspended - Part II

[LaSquirrel]

I thought I would kick off a part II
Part I is here
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3320513-Jess-Bradley-first-transgender-student-officer-suspended-after-flashing-photos

Quite obviously 'fot' should read 'for'

There's decades of women's activism to draw on. Don't spend so much time trashing it and learn to engage instead.

AngryAttackKittens

ain't that the truth. I think the culture there as now changed but unfortunately it took that to change it

do why don't they do it, is it a lack of information around there responsibility or training for people do thst they can create polices around such things

Men get their cocks out because they want to. By age 4ish kids know it’s not appropriate. I don’t think we’re going to solve male sexual predation using workplace CPD.

I've volunteered for many small community projects in my time. I'm currently volunteering for one now. I can assure anyone reading that small budgets do not result in volunteers regularly getting their cocks out in public.

I am unsure what small budget community groups have to do with allegations against Jess Bradley, who works for the NUS - a well funded organisation.

Could it be that some people would prefer that we do not talk about the thread topic?

Its not harsh at all bespin

Im not particularly interested in the ongoing conversation, although i did find aspects of the original thread interesting...and i realky want to know what happens next

Which is why im lurking

What im not doing is trying to get people to stop talking, or change the conversation to things are interesting me at this point of time (why are Australian movies so shit) im also not interested in turing this thread into a discussion of films as that would be derailing

Rufus is being kinder than you deserve.
Women get sick and tired of people like you judging their every utterance. It is rude and you have been asked again and again to stop and you keep trying to justify yourself instead of just knocking it the eff off.

Realky obviously means really

Fucking ipad

LangCleg the thread had gone off onto other groups so it came up it's now back on topic it seems please carry on. I thought on post 1200 we were running out of stuff and the tin hats were coming out linking mesmac and West Yorkshire police and mermaids.

How careful do we actually need to be? Regarding libel laws as individuals on an anonymous forum?

As careful as you'd be in any other non anonymous forum. Don't post anything libellous.

Rufustheyawningreindeer

you need a new iPad

also you can not surely include the films of baz lurrman in that statement lol

night night all

Night bespin

Ohhhhhhhhhh. Mesmac is a small community group with a low budget? The Mesmac with £255.8K in own use assets, £312.9K in long term investments and £1.0M in other assets?

No wonder the poor things can't afford proper safeguarding.

I'm quite happy with a third or fourth thread, you know.

I think your ipad has been at the gin.

I swear the keys are too close together on the keyboard

MNHQ should be watching this very carefully because they themselves would be liable for leaving up an actionable post.

I have only just caught up to Bowl's comment
Whether that’s proven to be the work of JB or not, whether it’s their penis in the pics

In actual fact, in that situation (to not attract more serious charges) JB had better claim that most/all the ladydicks belong to them, and/or they have permission to share the ladydick pics by the owners of same - else JB is in a bigger shitload of trouble beyond sanctions at work.

I would hate to be the one to have to study all the ladydick pics in order to verify that claim though. What a nasty job that would be!

Either way, JB has performed a career-killer.

When someone says "small community group" I picture a small group of volunteers gathering once a week in the local town hall, possibly over tea and biscuits if someone was feeling generous that week.

Oh christ

I was worried you meant my ipad bit for a second (or the Australian film bit)

Did you mean if there was an actionable post, rather than you think someone has made one

I think for precedence if you look at the Lord McAlpine claims, theoretically every retweet could have been actionable but it would logistically impossible to pursue.

《Hijacks thread》

Rufus, go watch Strictly Ballroom followed by Murials Wedding and Priscilla Queen of the desert. Then come back and say all Austrailian films are rubbish

《Resumes thread》

No I mean IF there was. I think if hq went to sleep with this thread running they would be nuts. Considering Carter Ruck is involved, I think they could have just shut all the threads on this down, for an easy life. That they haven't, is really quite impressive.

I think this also points to the need for a larger discussion about British libel laws and the misuse thereof.

Seen em all mip

And love em all

But there are only a few exceptions to the Australian films are rubbish theory

To be fair i should have said most

The Australian film industry isnt doing very well at all...from what ive just read any way

Apologies for derail....im off to bed

Priscilla Queen of the desert on this fourm are you mad lol