My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Ulster Rugby trial -continued

934 replies

ZibbidooZibbidooZibbidoo · 04/04/2018 18:18

New thread.

OP posts:
Report
BastardGingerCat · 05/04/2018 13:34

As this evidence has been presented to the judge and then dismissed from being presented to jurors as part of the case, it cannot be considered NEW evidence in any trial - is that right?

So the only way this evidence could be used in a trial is if further evidence was discovered that necessitated a retrial (may have terminology wrong) and then the prosecution could then petition the judge to include it that time. So this evidence in and of itself isn't going to land them in prison?

Report
rockshandy · 05/04/2018 14:14

Yes I think you are right.

Though I would wonder if it would be possible to question the judge's decision to not show it to the jury. Though not a lawyer so I have no idea if that is even possible.

I just can't work out how the reporting of this evidence can undermine the verdict.

Report
kikashi · 05/04/2018 14:15

I suspect if released the information will further damn their character

Report
ZibbidooZibbidooZibbidoo · 05/04/2018 14:19

Good point. The review by UR into their behaviour hasn’t yet finished. This info, whatever it is, could impact the outcome of that review and so the lawyers will be fighting tooth and nail to suppress it.

OP posts:
Report
SignedUpAgain · 05/04/2018 14:45

My DC currently attend Methody - the school are having a big 150 year anniversary coming up, with loads of celebrations and a special book which you can order.
Will be interesting to see if there is any mention of the "top shaggers" or if that chapter is now being hastily removed.

Report
kikashi · 05/04/2018 15:54
Report
sashh · 05/04/2018 16:28

Something being suggested on twitter is that it might show a pattern. The example being that if you have 20 convictions for theft that might be held back from the jury.

I suppose that would make sense if one or more of them has previously been investigated or had allegations made against them.

I doubt their behaviour that night was a one off so I suppose it is possible.

Report
eloisesparkle · 05/04/2018 19:36

The evidence presented to the judge, but is then dismissed from being shown to the jury.
Why would this be ?
I am not well up on law. Either Uk or Irish ( I'm in Republic of Ireland )

Report
QuentinSummers · 05/04/2018 19:43

kikashi Shock FFS

Report
sashh · 05/04/2018 19:44
Report
NotTakenUsername · 05/04/2018 20:45

Just went onto Malone RFC Facebook. Here are a few publicly shared photos from their victory.

Ulster Rugby trial -continued
Ulster Rugby trial -continued
Ulster Rugby trial -continued
Report
NotTakenUsername · 05/04/2018 20:47

Sorry the middle is from a newspaper but the other two are from their page.

Report
OlennasWimple · 05/04/2018 20:48

I am now wondering if I have very lucky or terribly naive that the "rugger buggers" I used to knock around with back in the day seemed like lads who liked a drink, did dumb things (usually involving a propensity for public nudity or demonstrating how strong they are) but would have been horrified at how these men treated that poor woman, and if they found out that any of their team mates had behaved like that they would have been completely snubbed.

Sad

Report
Snowqueeny75 · 05/04/2018 20:49

Sassh that is unbelievable when you read it like that. Also in Belfast slang it really sounds like they were taking drugs ‘did you tell them we were fucked? ‘No just said we were drinking’ hmmm

Has anyone listened to the second captain podcast? Only had chance to listen to first half, but actually first time have heard someone explain the lifestyle around being a young male sports star, the adulation from a young age, the agents smoothing and fixing everything, promising to make anything nasty go away. And the girls throwing themselves at them in clubs. There’s no way to excuse it, but I have been struggling with how to understand the level of entitlement and the podcast gave an interesting if pretty horrifying insight.

Report
CardsforKittens · 05/04/2018 20:52

Am I right in thinking that previous allegations can only be made known to the jury if witnesses are called to give evidence of good character?

Report
ZibbidooZibbidooZibbidoo · 05/04/2018 21:22

Thanks for linking that sassh

“Fucked” is drugs. No doubt about it.

Also, I know none of them come across well in those messages Hmm but that fella McIlroy sounds like the most annoying, irritating, pain in the arse needy git ever! What age is he?? Asking all those bloody questions and then “ooh what happened last night? Where’d you go?” Etc. WTF?? Your mates are being questioned by police for a serious sexual assault which you were party to and you want to know how their night out went?? Da fuck is wrong with you??

OP posts:
Report
Quimby · 05/04/2018 21:26

Previous convictions can be in those circumstances (generally)
Previous allegations can’t because they’re not proven, they’re just that unsubstantiated allegations.

Report
Twixes · 05/04/2018 21:29

Surely it's too risky for sportsmen to take drugs? They could be drug tested at any stage.

Mind you, drugs might explain how Olding was able to stay up so long with that amount of drink taken. And it's well known that certain drugs like cocaine bring out a nasty, violent and egotistical side in people's personalities.

Report
ZibbidooZibbidooZibbidoo · 05/04/2018 21:35

Surely it's too risky for sportsmen to take drugs? They could be drug tested at any stage.

As far as I know they had just come back from a tour and were on official time off so probably had a reasonable expectation of not being tested for anything for a few days or whatever.

OP posts:
Report
Quimby · 05/04/2018 21:42

Fucked is also regularly used to mean hammered in Ireland

If the height of the substance to the drugs rumours is then using “Fucked” then that’s beyond paper thin

Report
ZibbidooZibbidooZibbidoo · 05/04/2018 21:43

I think when you read it in context of Harrison’s reply then it is pretty clear they don’t mean drunk.

OP posts:
Report
Bumblefuddle · 05/04/2018 21:44

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

ZibbidooZibbidooZibbidoo · 05/04/2018 21:49

There’s one thing I found a bit odd in those messages. After Olding is asked that disgusting question and he says about spit roasting and merrygo-rounds, his friend says he knew it was olding’s lucky night. Is that suggesting Olding normally doesn’t manage to “pull” on a night out? If having sex with a woman means it’s his lucky night that implies it’s a very rare event.

OP posts:
Report
Bumblefuddle · 05/04/2018 21:49

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Bumblefuddle · 05/04/2018 21:50

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.