"We are asking that you think critically and answer our questions, which you have failed to do."
The thing is, that injunction goes both ways, and while the odd MRA jerk pops up in here, sometimes someone appears with some legitimate criticisms of feminism (or what is described as feminism these days). But because they deviate from the third wave borg mind, they're rounded up on and hounded out of the MNF like a witch from a medieval village. If they're male, they're an MRA; if they're female they're a 'hand maiden.'
While this is a feminist forum, I don't see how any good can come from the tacit ruling that all must comply with an intransigent class politics that simplistically divides human beings, in all their infinite variety, into oppressors and oppressed - or be driven out. I'm not making an exception of feminism. As a socialist I'd say class identity was a dumbass way of looking at economic inequality (if it wasn't then my the working-class electrician wouldn't be raking it in while the political science graduate is sleeping in an underpass). Yes, misogyny exists big time, but guess what - power in human societies is dynamic and complicated. There are a residue of very powerful men at the top of our corporate and political institutions, and that's wrong; but in the normal world that most of us inhabit, things are a bit more complicated. While women bear the brunt of sexual violence, more men are homeless than women; more men kill themselves than women; more men than women are unemployed. "Why is this feminism's problem?" you say. Well, it isn't directly; but it is an issue if you're promulgating the notion that most of the male population are in elite boys clubs, screwing their secretaries and blowing their millions at strip joints. I mean, yeah some of them are - but the guys sleeping on the streets and filling your supermarket shelves aren't that powerful are they? Where do they fit in to the ideological narrative? Surely, with all the privilege their born into they'd have made something of themselves?
What I think many feminists do these days (and in fact many identity ideologues, left and right) is see the entire world through one prism, and anything that can't be shoehorned into their narrative is rejected. So they go into their echo chambers and talk to lots of other people who agree with them.
So if someone comes in here and starts being an abusive, misogynist arsehole and saying 'all you feminazis should be raped;' then ban the fucker; but sometimes someone comes along and merely...wait for it... disagrees with you; and for that crime they're treated as no different from the misogynist troll.
I'm not attacking feminism per se, just saying that the balkanised, echo chamber ID politics in evidence in forums like this sucks - only reinforcing the divisions that social justice movements were once in the business of breaking down.