It's interesting isn't it, how far you can take the argument logically. According to the article some transpeople reviled her, others thought that she was completely correct.
I don't understand the transpeople who were completely against what she did, or the way transpeople tend to exclude otherkin etc from their argument.
Either being trans(anything) is completely natural and normal and should be accepted fully, or its not. The idea that transgender is "real" but nothing else "trans" is, is simply illogical.